2024-03-28T11:06:36Z
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/oai
oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002531
2023-03-08T01:45:06Z
323:350:373:406
空間的視点取得課題の自己中心的反応に関する2つの理論の比較
An examination of two theories on egocentric responses inspatial perspective-taking task
杉村, 伸一郎
Sugimura, Shinichiro
今川, 峰子
Imagawa, Mineko
竹内, 謙彰
Takeuchi, Yoshiaki
open access
spatial perspective-taking
egocentric response
viewpoint
non-construction theory
adherence theory
The purpose of this study was to compare two theories on egocentric responses in spatial perspective-taking tasks. The adherence theory argues that egocentric responses occur based on children's adherence to their own view. On the other hand, the non-construction theory argues that children can not produce egocentric responses until when they construct a single perspective. To examine which of these theories can explain developmental changes in perspective-taking ability, the effects of viewpoint (own and other), age (4-, 6-, and 8-year-old), stimulus (simple, median, and complex), and response mode (object construction and photo selection) on egocentric responses were investigated. In the own viewpoint condition, egocentric responses increased with age, and decreased for the complex stimulus. These results are consistent with the non-construction theory. In the other viewpoint condition, egocentric responses decreased with age and increased for the complex stimulus. The former result supports the non-construction theory. Although the latter does not support the theory, high correct percentage in the simple stimulus suggests that even four-year-old children do not adhere to their own view.
国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。
名古屋大学教育学部
1995-12
jpn
departmental bulletin paper
VoR
https://doi.org/10.18999/bulfep.42.17
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/3954
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2531
10.18999/bulfep.42.17
03874796
名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科
42
17
28
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2531/files/KJ00000137484.pdf
application/pdf
1.2 MB
2018-02-16