2024-03-29T07:14:38Z
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/oai
oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00023534
2023-01-16T04:13:17Z
499:500:501
Anterior interosseous nerve and posterior interosseous nerve involvement in neuralgic amyotrophy
Akane, Mao
Iwatsuki, Katsuyuki
Tatebe, Masahiro
Nishizuka, Takanobu
Kurimoto, Shigeru
Yamamoto, Michiro
Hirata, Hitoshi
open access
© 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Anterior interosseous nerve
Neuralgic amyotrophy
Peripheral nerve palsy
Posterior interosseous nerve
Radial nerve
Neurolysis
Objectives: The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of anterior interosseous nerve and posterior interosseous nerve involvement in neuralgic amyotrophy. Methods: In a retrospective chart review, 51 cases (49 patients) with anterior and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome were investigated in terms of their symptoms, course of disease, and prognosis. Results: Patients first presented with pain in 52.9% of cases. The location of the pain was distal to the shoulder in most cases (85.1%). Sensory involvement was found in 27.5% of patients, and patients with pain before paresis had fewer sensory symptoms (p = 0.006). Neurolysis significantly improved Hand20 scores, but conservative treatment did not (p = 0.020 vs. 0.204). Conclusions: Patients with anterior interosseous nerve and posterior interosseous nerve affection in neuralgic amyotrophy had less pain. Neurolysis can be superior to conservative treatment in the patients with focal constrictions and no spontaneous recovery.
Elsevier
2016-12
eng
journal article
AM
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/25731
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/23534
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.11.001
0303-8467
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
151
108
112
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/23534/files/CNN-D-16-710R3.pdf
application/pdf
443.5 kB
2017-12-01