2024-03-29T08:20:41Z
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/oai
oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002247
2023-11-09T02:06:28Z
323:350:373:390
SOLIDARITY BETWEEN PARENTS AND THERAPISTS : After the group-therapeutic-practice with the mentally handicapped children
障害幼児療育における同窓の連帯をめぐって
村上, 英治
6025
MURAKAMI, Eiji
6026
中西, 由里
6027
NAKANISHI, Yuri
6028
森崎, 康宣
6029
MORISAKI, Yasunori
6030
後藤, 秀爾
6031
GOTO, Shuji
6032
加藤, 礼子
6033
KATO, Reiko
6034
水野, 博文
6035
MIZUNO, Hirofumi
6036
1984-12-24
We have tried group-therapeutic-practice with the mentally handicapped and their parents for these fourteen years. Up to now we have worked with 48 children and their families and 61 therapists. And in order to extend the feeling of togetherness between parents and therapists we have met them twice, once in 1981 after an interval of 11 years and again in 1983, 13 years since the practice began. And after our meetings with the parents a questionnaire was used in an effort to grasp the significance of our coming together again. The questionnaire was sent to all group members: parents, therapists, and volunteers. 71% of the fathers, 80% of the mothers, 68% of the therapists and 87% of the volunteers completed and returned the questionnaire. The results are as follows; 1. Most of mothers pointed out that they still felt a certain togetherness between us and that atmosphere of the meetings had stimulated the children. Fathers also pointed this out and explained that such events made mothers more at ease. 2. For the therapists the meetings were reported to be significant from two points of view. First, the therapists found pleasure in seeing the growth of the children whom they had once contacted. Second, the meeting was a good chance for therapists so inclined to be introspective. 3. As for the effects on the volunteers who participated in our group for the first time, they felt that the meetings promoted a better understandin of the handicapped and facilitated a growing interest in group-therapeutic-practice with the handicapped.
国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを利用している。
departmental bulletin paper
名古屋大学教育学部
1984-12-24
名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科
31
227
249
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/3670
03874796
jpn