2024-03-29T06:46:20Z
https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/oai
oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00012672
2023-02-10T02:11:47Z
326:521:522:1297
Diversity and Structural Features in Passive Form
受身形式の多様性と構文的特徴
白, 明学
39844
BAIK, Myunghak
39845
2011-03-31
The present study i) suggests that universal passive sentences can be divided into two types, one is an aru-based passive type and the other is an iru-based passive type and ii) shows that these two passive types function as follows, aru-based passive type; This type functions fundamentally on the transitive-intransitive opposition of the object, and can function secondarily as the indicator of active-passive opposition upon its transitive-intransitive opposition. The semantic focus of this type is on the state or the change of objective, so non-objective arguments cannot be raised into subjective. iru-based passive type; This type takes an animate subjective of the passive voice and according to their semantic characteristics it can also be divided into two subclasses, namely, a pat-ta, tangha-ta type and a toy-ta type. On the one hand, when this type of passive sentence functions as the indicator of active-passive opposition (pat-ta, tangha-ta type), the subjective shows the semantic feature being directly influenced by the event which is described in the passive sentence. On the other hand, when this type functions as the indicator of transitive-intransitive opposition (toy-ta type), it shows the similar semantic characteristics with aru-based passive type. This observation suggests further that iii) it can be determined by the characteristics of Possessor passive, whether or not Korean and Japanese have indirect passive.
departmental bulletin paper
名古屋大学文学部
2011-03-31
名古屋大学文学部研究論集. 文学
57
69
82
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/14559
0469-4716
jpn