@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001534, author = {小川, 一美 and Ogawa, Kazumi and 吉田, 俊和 and Yoshida, Toshikazu}, journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 心理学}, month = {Dec}, note = {The narrative style takes the form of voluntary and relatively lengthy statements in response to questions, whereas the fragmented style is composed of short statements in response to questions. The purpose of this study was to examine some effects of these styles on personality cognition. In main experiment, Subjects were 80 undergraduates (half were male and half were female). Subjects played the role of an interviewer, and confederates played that of an interviewee. The subjects asked some questions according to a card provided, and the interviewee replied to the questions in the form of either a narrative style or a fragmented style. After the interview, subjects were asked to rate the interviewee's personality on a questionnaire. The major findings were as follows : (1) subjects rated the female speaker using narrative style much more favorably on the social desirability dimension of personality than speakers in any other condition; (2) male subjects rated the interviewee using a fragmented style lower on social desirability than that using a narrative style, as well as the two female ratings., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。}, pages = {131--139}, title = {発話スタイルがパーソナリティ認知に及ぼす効果(2) :叙述的発話と断片的発話の比較}, volume = {46}, year = {1999} }