@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001572, author = {寺田, 盛紀 and TERADA, Moriki}, journal = {職業と技術の教育学}, month = {Mar}, note = {In this article I try to clarify some achievements of the comparative studies, especially made by German researchers, on the German and Japanese system in the field of vocational education, and to propose a conception for the comparative model in the research of vocational education system. I analyse the following topics. I. Preface. II. Investigation on preceding researches in the comparative vocational education. III. Characteristics of the theories concerning Japanese system as a "market model" IV. Three dimensional model for the comparative vocational education. V. Conclusions. German comparative studies on the vocational education have developed from one dimensional analysis to more multi-dimensional one since earlier 1980's. W.-D. Greinert systematized firstl y the model theory for the comparative research. His analytical model was determined by the influence of the state on the regulation for vocational education. Though, from his viewpoint, the Japanese vocational education system is categorized as a "market model" or a typical "OJT model" state, we must consider the bureauc raticer function of Japanese Ministerium of Education, on which is observed in the field of school vocational education. We must not estimate the system character from only a well-knowned partial institution, a training within industry for employments, but characterize it in total involving some basic school training. Some German researchers have emphasized not only the role of political factor, but also the sociological or the labour economic one. I think their foctors must be translated in pedagogical aspects, if it is valid to adopt two another factors besides political one. I think that we had better define those three aspects for comparative criteria as a educational institution-, a educational goal-, and a curriculum dimension. By the way, we need it for the research of comparative vocational education to analyse non vocational qualified training praxis, and some further training systems, adding to the European initial trainig system, in which vocational qualifications are given., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。}, pages = {1--16}, title = {職業教育システムの比較類型とその基準 : ドイツ職業教育学者の比較に学ぶ}, volume = {11}, year = {1998} }