@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001663,
 author = {丸山, 真名美 and MARUYAMA, Manami},
 journal = {名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {The purpose of this study was to examine the developmental change of strategy use and the effect of temporal distance on recency judgment. Subjects were administered the next task and the last task. The question of the next task was "Which will come soon, your next birthday or next Christmas?". The temporal orientation of the next task was forward. That of the last task was "Which was long time ago, your last birthday or last Christmas?". The temporal orientation of the last task was backward. Study 1 was conducted to examine the strategy use of children. Participants were 6 to 10-year old children. They were asked how they judged recency of two events, too. Main result was that older children used the location-based strategy and younger children used the distance-based strategy. This suggested that older children had organized temporal schema. And older children could judge more correctly than younger children. To examine the effect of temporal distance on recency judgement, study 2 was conducted. 685 elementary school children participated in study 2. They were 2nd-, 3rd-, 4th-, 5th-, 6th-graders. They were not asked how they judged. Results were as follows. In both tasks, older children judged more correctly than younger children. In the next task, the longer the temporal distance from research day to their next birthday was, the lower the correct percentage was. Thus, the temporal distance from research day to children's next birthday influenced to recency judgement. But this effect was weaker to older children than to younger children. This suggested that older children used location-based strategy and they had organized temporal schema, too. In the last task, the longer the temporal distance from research day to their last birthday was, the higher the correct percentage was. This result was different from the result of the next task. The distance effect was weak for older children. Temporal orientation of the next task was forward. That of the last task was backward. The next task was presented first usually. The difference of result of the next task and the last task was due to theses factors. It was possible to interpret that children used the forward order relation of events on the next task and used this relation on the last task, too. Finally, the relation of the organized temporal schema and the strategy of recency judgement was discussed. The conclusion of this study was that the organized temporal schema made possible the location-based judgement. However methodological problem were remain. It was the order of task presentation. The difference of results of the next task and the last task might occur due to this problem. Thus, to clear up this matter, order of task presentation must be counterbalanced., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。},
 pages = {131--140},
 title = {未来と過去の 2 つの方向における時間の近さの判断},
 volume = {48},
 year = {2001}
}