{"_buckets": {"deposit": "3b8642b6-2a84-4d79-aec5-1fae515c8c3d"}, "_deposit": {"id": "18364", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "18364"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00018364", "sets": ["1628"]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2014-06-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1", "bibliographicPageEnd": "67", "bibliographicPageStart": "45", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "62", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "経済科学"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper uses data on individual manufacturing firms for 2000-2005 and estimates separate stochastic production frontiers for private and state firms in Vietnam. The primary objective is to compare these firms\u0027 productivity in terms of their production frontiers and technical efficiency. The empirical results show that the average private firm has a production frontier that is 39% lower and technical efficiency that is 3% higher than the average state firm. Consequently, state firms are inferred to have considerably higher productivity than that of private firms. State firms have a higher production frontier because access to flexible state credit allows them to maintain the quality of their machinery and equipment. In addition, they have priority rights to utilize natural resources, only profitable firms were left after the restructuring and dissolution of state firms, and these firms are likely to have greater management ability or R\u0026D investment. These results imply that the Vietnamese government employed policies favoring state firms. To increase private firms\u0027 productivity, the state should give them rights similar to those granted to state firms. Otherwise, the manufacturing sector will not achieve its productivity potential; rather, it will face serious stagnation and impede Vietnam\u0027s development.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "URI", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://www.soec.nagoya-u.ac.jp/htm/eco_sci/ej/ej62.html"}, {"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/20474"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/ecos.62.1.45", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学大学院経済学研究科"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN（print）", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0022-9725", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "VU, Thi Bich Lien"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "53407", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "vu.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "504.2 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 504200.0, "url": {"label": "vu.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/18364/files/vu.pdf"}, "version_id": "6c9bd4b2-2ffa-47a3-8c25-ef8b4f5051c6"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "Production frontier", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Technical efficiency", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Vietnamese manufacturing firms", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Firm ownership", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Firm size", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Small Privately-Owned and Large State-Owned Manufacturing Firms in Vietnam: A Productivity Comparison for 2000-2005", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Small Privately-Owned and Large State-Owned Manufacturing Firms in Vietnam: A Productivity Comparison for 2000-2005"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["1628"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/ecos.62.1.45", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2014-07-17"}, "publish_date": "2014-07-17", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "18364", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Small Privately-Owned and Large State-Owned Manufacturing Firms in Vietnam: A Productivity Comparison for 2000-2005"], "weko_shared_id": null}