@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001850,
 author = {塩田, 芳久 and Shiota, Y.},
 journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {The purpose of this study was to ascertain the effect of different types of criteria (general, particular and concrete) and the effect of different forms of choices (number of choices required, recall form and recognition form etc.). The subjects were 164 pupils in three classrooms of grade 4th, 6th and 8th. The results were as follows : (1) Correlations between three types of criteria ranged from .64 to .92. (2) Three factors were discovered by applying factor analysis (Thurstone's centroid method) to different nine test-items which belong to three types of criteria. The first factor loadings were very large, and the second and the third factor loadings were very small. The first factor may be a P factor (comparable to Spearman's G) standing for Personality quailty that underlies acceptance. The second and the third factor comparable to Spearman's S may imply qualities for acceptance in situations requiring particular skills or characteristics. (3) Correlations from .64 to .92 were obtained between recall forms and recognition forms. (4) Test-retest reliability coefficients of three choices were from .76 to .93 and these of choices allowing "as many as you wish" were from .82 to .92. (5) Correlations between weighted scores (5,3,1 to the first, second, and third choice) and unweighted scores were from .85 to .94., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。},
 pages = {183--192},
 title = {<個人研究>学級集団の研究 (I) : ソシオメトリック・テストの選択基準と選択形式},
 volume = {11},
 year = {1964}
}