@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001962, author = {大橋, 正夫 and OHASHI, Masao and 三輪, 弘道 and MIWA, Hiromichi and 長戸, 啓子 and NAGATO, Keiko and 平林, 進 and HIRABAYASHI, Susumu}, journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科}, month = {Mar}, note = {This research is designed to examine the effects of photographed faces as the firsts tep to study the process : "how to form impression through person's appearance." Aims of the present study are as follows : 1. To clarify the differences of the impression between color pictures and black & white ones. 2. To select some typical pictures for future researches which are dissimilar to each other. Ss are college females : 123 persons in the first investigation, and 89 in the second. Procedure is devided into the following four steps. 1. To collect 90 pictures each of color and black & white of female students. 2. To use 25 bipolar adjectives with 7 points as the rating scales of the impression. 3. 90 pictures are devided into 15 sets. Some Ss are presented with a color set first (C-1) and a black & white one next (W-2). The rest are presented reversely (W-1,C-2). 4. For the first set of pictures only, besides making a check at a point on the rating scales, Ss are also asked to decide the degree of the certainty of their rating. Major results obtained are as follows : 1. When examining the inter-correlations between 6 pictures in each set, we find the average correlation insignificant, This means that Ss tended to rate not stereotypically but differentially. 2. There is a significant interrelation between the ratings in the two investigations. In the both Ss' group, average intercorrelations are significant. In addition, most of the correlations between two ratings of each subject are significant. 3. The mean of the certainty of the colored is not different from that of balck & white, The variance among 25 scales is small. The certainty is weak on the middle of the scale, getting stronger towards both polars. 4. Ninety pictures are classified into 4 groups by means of both a method of hierarchical clustering and a factor analysis. The correspondence between the both methods is pretty good. Profiles of the four representative pictures are presented, amog which will be seen differences to a large extent., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。}, pages = {13--25}, title = {<原著>写真による印象形成の研究 : 序報}, volume = {19}, year = {1973} }