@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000030,
 author = {宮本, 伸吾 and MIYAMOTO, Shingo},
 journal = {教育論叢},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The purpose of this paper is to clarify how continuity of experience and thought is found in John Dewey's Logic. In doing so, I keep in mind the problem that Richard Rorty pointed out to base our claims to knowledge on experience. First, this paper examines Rorty's criticism of continuity of experience and thought. As well as the debate on the reinterpretation of the relationship of experience and thought formed by it. In this section, it is pointed out that the relationship between Dewey’s logic and metaphysics has not been fully taken into account in both cases. Second, this paper discusses continuity and pay attention to the relationship between metaphysics and logic. By doing so, it is found that the continuity can only be determined by logic, although it is positioned as the postulate of logic. Finally, this paper traces Dewey’s description of how to start thinking from experience and explains how the continuity between them can be determined. This paper concludes as follows. 1. Dewey’s continuity of experience and thought is confirmed by logic. Therefore, continuity is not a metaphysics that grounds logic from the outside. 2. The continuity of experience and thought in Dewey’s logic is determined through the function of language.},
 pages = {31--45},
 title = {デューイの論理学における経験と思考の連続性},
 volume = {64},
 year = {2021}
}