@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000188, author = {服部, 美奈 and HATTORI, Mina and 神内, 陽子 and JINNAI, Yoko and アユ アズハリヤ and Ayu Azhariyah and エル アマンダ デ ユリ and El Amanda de Yurie and アズミ ムフリサフ and Azmi Mukhlisah}, issue = {2}, journal = {名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学, Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development. Educational Sciences}, month = {Mar}, note = {This research examines Indonesia’s curriculum, implemented from 2013, and describes the characteristics and development to date, and investigates various perceptions regarding its revision. By reviewing this chronologically, light may be shed on the future direction of Indonesian education and illuminate future prominent issues. This paper prioritizes a description of the issues surrounding the 2013 revision rather than an explanation of findings from its implementation. This paper is organized as follows. First, a background explanation of the 2013 curriculum revision in terms of internal and external issues recognized by the MEC. Second, the philosophy and objectives of the curriculum are explained via a discussion of the adoption of competency-based curriculum and cross-curricular integrated thematic learning. Third, the development and changes in the curriculum are described in terms of relevant laws and regulations. The following three points were clarified through this research. First, the ”internal issues” recognized in the 2013 curriculum revision include (1) issues related to education in terms of national education standards, and (2) issues related to the growth of the working-age population. These realities suggest impacted Indonesia’s motivation to improve education quality on all levels. As educational institutions’ accreditation at each educational stage went under greater scrutiny, the curriculum revision became necessary. The latter point is an issue that relates intimately with Indonesia’s curriculum revision in terms of demographic composition. The the discussion of the “external issues,” and the ten “future competencies” deemed necessary for future generations, provided the impetus and reasoning for Indonesia’s commitment to improve its ranking in international academic achievement tests. Second, this investigation clarified that one of the features of the 2013 curriculum was the reform of a learning format that emphasizes student-centered learning and interrelationships, incorporating a curriculum that encourages an interdisciplinary approach with an integrated thematic learning model. Cross-curricular core competencies are established based on the four aspects of mental attitude, social attitude, knowledge, and skills, embodied as basic competencies for each subject. The successful acquisition of these competencies becomes the requirement for graduation from each educational level. Third, in implementing the 2013 curriculum, it became clear that there was a swing back to the 2006 curriculum from the beginning of its implementation. In this regard, different responses were found in the Ministry of Education and Culture and the Ministry of Religious Affairs. The final implementation nationwide was for the 2019/20 school year calendar. The MoRA continued to implement the 2013 curriculum with an enhancement of religious education. Many years of trial and error in implementation occurred, including differences in the response between general schools and Islamic schools (madrasah), as well as differences in the application among the schools.}, pages = {81--96}, title = {インドネシアにおける2013年カリキュラムの施行とその展開過程}, volume = {67}, year = {2021} }