@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000908, author = {藤田, 浩之 and FUJITA, Hiroyuki}, journal = {名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学, Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development. Psychology and human developmental sciences}, month = {Mar}, note = {The study, conducted seven years after the Great East Japan Earthquake, is aimed to reveal the mental health and other predicaments of evacuees who left their homes and their families in Fukushima Prefecture and moved to Kyoto Prefecture as a result of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, and the support they received particularly from the local governments. Distress level was measured by using the Japanese version of K6 (Kessler 6 scale). The results of Study 1 indicated that K6 scores of evacuees living in Kyoto Prefecture alone or those living without job or pension were significantly higher than others. This seemed to reflect social capital of the evacuees. They have felt problems and fears of financial difficulties as well as anxieties for the future and the health of their children. 21% of the evacuees (n=75) scored 13 points or over, exceeding the K6 cutoff point of 13. They were defined as people with high risk. Support has been provided by family, local governments such as Kyoto Prefecture and Kyoto City, and people in the evacuation area. Positive correlation was identified between the K6 scores of evacuees living in Kyoto Prefecture and their scores of problems and fears, whereas there was negative correlation between their K6 scores and support scores. In Study 2, SCAT, the Steps for Coding and Theorization, was used to examine free description on the questionnaire written by the evacuees regarding their situation (n = 38). As result, their voices were summarized into three major categories: (1) problems of evacuation life, such as distrust, lack of understanding of evacuation and concerns on their children and family; (2) anxiety for unpredictable future and (3) acceptance of evacuation life, i.e. affirmation of the current situation. Evacuees faced problems that they could not understand regarding the evacuation. They had family problems with no prospects for the future. But it was considered that some people had accepted their refuge life, partly through the process of their children growing up and assistance they received from local people.}, pages = {1--11}, title = {東日本大震災による原子力災害の京都府の避難者のストレスと支援}, volume = {67}, year = {2021} }