@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:02001175,
 author = {TAMURA, Tetsuki},
 journal = {名古屋大学法政論集, Journal of Law and Politics},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {In recent years, there has been talk of a ‘crisis of liberal democracy’. The focus then has been on the rise of ‘post-liberal’ democracy as ‘illiberal democracy’. However, does the ‘crisis of liberal democracy’ really mean the ‘crisis of democracy’? This article attempts to give an answer for this question through a reconsideration of the relationship between liberal democracy and deliberative democracy. In doing so, this article will focus on the plurality of the meaning of ‘liberal’ in liberal democracy. As the meaning of liberal is plural (capitalism, competitive party system, the public–private distinction, and constitutionalism), what the ‘post-liberal’ means is plural as well. Then I propose that we can find the varieties of the post-liberal conception of deliberative democracy, according to the plurality of the meaning of liberal. They include (1) workplace deliberative democracy, (2) non-electoral representation and/or non-representative democracy with deliberation, (3) deliberative democracy in the private sphere (deliberative systems in private spaces), and (4) non-constitutional deliberative (discursive) democracy in the public sphere.},
 pages = {25--49},
 title = {Varieties of the Post-Liberal Conception of Deliberative Democracy},
 volume = {290},
 year = {2021}
}