@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:02001985, author = {張, 婧禕 and ZHANG, Jingyi and 王, 蕾 and WANG, Lei and 玉岡, 賀津雄 and TAMAOKA, Katsuo}, journal = {ことばの科学, STUDIA LINGUISTICA}, month = {Dec}, note = {本研究は,中国人日本語学習者(N=83)による一時性と重複性の動作を示すオノマトペの理解を検討した。オノマトペの理解テストは12問で構成され,2種類(一時性および重複性)のオノマトペの理解を測定した。また,共起する動詞の種類は,サ変動詞,自動詞および他動詞の3種類からなる。語彙能カテストの得点を用いて,83名の学習者を語彙能カの上位群と下位群の2群に分けた。分類木分析でオノマトペの理解の正誤における背景諸要因を(1)語彙能力(上・下位群),(2)共起する動詞(サ変動詞,自動詞,他動詞)および(3)オノマトペの種類(一時性および重複性)の3つの説明変数で予測した。その結果,語彙能力が重複性のオノマトペの理解に強く促進した。それに対して,一時性のオノマトペは,共起ずる動詞の種類が最も強い要囚となったが,語彙能力の影響はその次であり,共起する動詞の種類と語彙能力との相互作用がみられた。, The present study investigated the comprehension of temporal and duplicative movement onomatopoeia by native Chinese speakers learning Japanese (N=83). The onomatopoeia comprehension test consists of 12 questions divided into two types of onomatopoeia, temporality and duplicative movements, and three types of co-occurrence verb (suru-verb, transitive verb and intransitive verb). Based on a Japanese lexical knowledge test, 83 learners were divided into two groups of a lower/higher lexical knowledge. A classification tree analysis was utilized to predict the accuracy of onomatopoeia understanding according to three independent variables, (1) lower higher lexical knowledge groups, (2) three types of co-occurrence verb, and (3) two kinds of onomatopoeia. The result indicated that lexical knowledge significantly contributed to understanding of duplicative movement onomatopoeia whereas comprehension of temporal movement onomatopoeia varied depending on the type of co-occurrence verb. Differing from duplicative movement onomatopoeia, temporal movement onomatopoeia showed interaction of the types of co-occurrence verbs and learners' lexical knowledge.}, pages = {87--102}, title = {中国人日本語学習者による動作の一時性および重複性を示すオノマトペの理解}, volume = {35}, year = {2021} }