@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:02004205,
 author = {Takamoto, Naohiro and Takazawa, Shinya and Yoshida, Yuki and Sasaki, Tamotsu and Nishi, Akira},
 issue = {4},
 journal = {Nagoya Journal of Medical Science},
 month = {Nov},
 note = {Transporting pediatric patients with severe cardiovascular complications to the fluoroscopy room can be difficult. Therefore, we started using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector (FPD) for nasojejunal tube (NJT) placement. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in length of time of NJT placement and dosage of radiation exposure using a portable imaging device with FPD versus fluoroscopy. Pediatric patients who underwent NJT placement between April 2016 and December 2018 were identified retrospectively from the clinical records. The age, sex, body weight, and height of each child at the time of the procedure as well as the procedure time, outcomes of the procedure, and dosage of radiation exposure was compared between the two groups. In 76 cases of NJT placement (41 patients), there was no significant difference in the success rate of NJT placement between the FPD (90%) and fluoroscopy groups (95%). However, the NJT placement time was significantly longer in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (488 s vs 291 s). According to our calculations, the radiation dosage was lower in the FPD group than in the fluoroscopy group (136 μGy per procedure vs 2819 μGy per procedure). These results suggest that NJT placement using a portable imaging device with an FPD can be an effective method for children who are difficult to transport with an equal success rate and lower dosage of radiation exposure compared with conventional fluoroscopy.},
 pages = {772--781},
 title = {Examination of the effectiveness of bedside nasojejunal tube placement using a portable imaging device with a flat panel detector},
 volume = {84},
 year = {2022}
}