ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. A200 教育学部/教育発達科学研究科
  2. A200b 刊行物
  3. 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学
  4. 71(1)

探究的な学びにおける問題解決過程の評価に関する課題と展望

https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.71.1.57
https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.71.1.57
0e9e6073-644b-43aa-a8e6-e31330a2fbee
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
nueduca7101_05.pdf nueduca7101_05.pdf (583.8 KB)
アイテムタイプ itemtype_ver1(1)
公開日 2025-02-04
タイトル
タイトル 探究的な学びにおける問題解決過程の評価に関する課題と展望
言語 ja
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Issues and Prospects for the Evaluation of Problem-Solving Processes in Inquiry-Based Learning
言語 en
著者 西浦, 明倫

× 西浦, 明倫

ja 西浦, 明倫

en NISHIURA, Akitomo

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This paper aims to clarify the issues in need of addressing in the evaluation methods of problemsolving processes in an inquiry-based learning model, then suggest potential directions for improvement. A review of previous studies is conducted from two perspectives: (1) regarding the evaluation criteria of qualities and competencies expected to be acquired during the problem-solving process or the Period for Inquiry-Based Cross-Disciplinary Study, and (2) methods suggested to improve the validity and reliability of evaluations. First, it is believed that the evaluation criteria of qualities and competencies to be acquired during a problem-solving process or the Period for Inquiry-Based Cross-Disciplinary Study can be captured through the composition of rubrics. Yet as the learner’s will and earnestness has not been adequately evaluated within this method, a more valid measure for a problem-solving evaluation would include these personal motivational characteristics in addition to other qualities and competencies. Second, regarding methods aimed to improve the validity and reliability of evaluations, research has been carried out that focuses on three elements: the “tools” as evaluation criteria, the “data” as evaluation targets, and the “people” as evaluators. The challenges identified include the inevitable dependence on the evaluator’s subjectivity as well as the opacity of the process by which an evaluator determines which criterion to be applied to learning evaluation. Some considerations for increasing objectivity include processing data, using secondary data, and/or developing formalized methods that will bring the “people” and the “data” closer to each other. These results suggest that future approaches should aim to objectify the “data” as learning outcomes and incorporate the learner’s will and earnestness towards problem-solving, a perspective that would encourage new methods for evaluating problem-solving processes in inquiry-based learning. However, while acknowledging the importance of validity and reliability, the pursual of high evaluations should not be portrayed as the goal itself.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
言語 ja
出版者
出版者 The Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプresource http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/nueduca.71.1.57
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1346-0307
書誌情報 ja : 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学
en : Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development. Educational Sciences

巻 71, 号 1, p. 57-65, 発行日 2024-09-30
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-02-04 05:22:36.440453
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3