ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. A200 教育学部/教育発達科学研究科
  2. A200b 刊行物
  3. 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学
  4. 71(1)

問題解決学習に特有の思考様式の中間項を用いた授業分析による解明 : 発言の意図・含意の解釈の客観的表現

https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.71.1.81
https://doi.org/10.18999/nueduca.71.1.81
947ecf50-cb46-4579-8e22-0e7a331ea855
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
nueduca7101_07.pdf nueduca7101_07.pdf (784.5 KB)
アイテムタイプ itemtype_ver1(1)
公開日 2025-02-04
タイトル
タイトル 問題解決学習に特有の思考様式の中間項を用いた授業分析による解明 : 発言の意図・含意の解釈の客観的表現
言語 ja
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Elucidation of thinking styles specific to problem-solving learning through lesson analysis using the intermediate term : Objective expression of interpretation of the intention and implication of statements
言語 en
著者 柴田, 好章

× 柴田, 好章

ja 柴田, 好章

en SHIBATA, Yoshiaki

Search repository
丹下, 悠史

× 丹下, 悠史

ja 丹下, 悠史

en TANGE, Yushi

Search repository
水野, 正朗

× 水野, 正朗

ja 水野, 正朗

en MIZUNO, Masao

Search repository
埜嵜, 志保

× 埜嵜, 志保

ja 埜嵜, 志保

en NOZAKI, Shiho

Search repository
花里, 真吾

× 花里, 真吾

ja 花里, 真吾

en HANASATO, Shinji

Search repository
坂本, 將暢

× 坂本, 將暢

ja 坂本, 將暢

en SAKAMOTO, Masanobu

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 1990, the Laboratory of Educational Methodology at Nagoya University has been working to elucidate the structure of the relationship among various lesson factors through lesson analysis based on detailed lesson records (transcript), and has proposed a descriptive form called the “Intermediate Term” which is used to enhance the validity of interpretation and the possibility of sharing. The Intermediate Term is a descriptive form that is positioned “in between” the observed and recorded lesson records as facts and the related structure of various lesson factors as a theoretical model of the classroom teaching and learning, which is derived by the researcher through analysis and discussion of the records, and is described using symbols defined for lesson analysis. It is described using symbols defined for the purpose of lesson analysis. In this study, we aim to reconsider a series of Intermediate Term studies and develop them as a research methodology. On the other hand, “problem-solving learning” in social studies lessons deserves attention in today’s world, where the realization of independent, interactive, and deep learning is demanded. In problem-solving learning, children, who are the subjects of their daily lives, take up the most serious problems they feel and, in the process of seeking solutions, acquire knowledge and skills and think from multiple angles and perspectives in a proactive and cooperative manner. However, it is not only facts familiar to daily life that evoke a sense of urgency in problem-solving learning, but also the interaction between the learning material and the children that establishes that urgency. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify how earnestness is generated and heightened in the process of encountering and pursuing the material in classes oriented toward solving social problems selected by the teacher. In this study, based on the results and issues of a series of studies on the Intermediate Term as lesson analysis methods, we aim to develop it for clarifying the related structure of various lesson factors by actively including the students’ intention and implication uncovered by the analyst’s interpretation of the statements in the description. In addition, we aim to elucidate the thinking style inherent to problem-solving learning by clarifying how children express the emergence and growth of earnestness through their interactions with events and people they encounter in the process of learning. As a result of our research, we were able to elucidate the form of thinking inherent in problemsolving learning through analysis of students’ utterances in a junior high school social studies class on the theme of “Can Japanese agriculture become a strong agriculture? The forms of thinking that were identified by lesson analysis are as follows. -- [Specific examples of success] >> {(generalized solution)} -- [Specific facts that prevent success] >> {(generalized solution): denial of feasibility} Future research is needed to increase the number of cases analyzed, to increase objectivity and validity in converting to intermediate terms, and to generate theory from intermediate terms by means of symbolic forms.
言語 en
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
言語 ja
出版者
出版者 The Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプresource http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/nueduca.71.1.81
ID登録タイプ JaLC
助成情報
識別子タイプ Crossref Funder
助成機関識別子 https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001691
助成機関名 日本学術振興会
言語 ja
助成機関名 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
言語 en
研究課題番号 19H01627
研究課題番号URI https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-19H01627/
研究課題名 授業分析の学術的高度化と国際化による授業理論の再構築
言語 ja
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1346-0307
書誌情報 ja : 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学
en : Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development. Educational Sciences

巻 71, 号 1, p. 81-92, 発行日 2024-09-30
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2025-02-04 05:22:40.594369
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3