WEKO3
アイテム
近代化論の失効による理論構築の消極性と主流理論の不在 : 機能理論の受容とパラダイム転換論に着目して
https://doi.org/10.18999/kyor.68.1
https://doi.org/10.18999/kyor.68.17c45feba-3c1a-47d2-82ea-6f84daa20ea3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
kyor_68_1.pdf (806.5 KB)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | itemtype_ver1(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2025-04-14 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 近代化論の失効による理論構築の消極性と主流理論の不在 : 機能理論の受容とパラダイム転換論に着目して | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | The Lapse of the Modernization Theory Causes the Passivity of Theory Construction and Absence of Mainstream Theory : The Acceptance of Functional Theory and Paradigm Shift Controversy | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 著者 |
土師, 諒也
× 土師, 諒也
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The theories in Japan’s sociology of education have drastically formed, just as the academic identity has. From the beginning of the late 1960s until recently, these theories have varied from Human Capital Theory and Structural Functionalism based on methodological positivism to Correspondence Theory, Critical Theory, and Interpretive Approach, to deconstructionism under the influence of postmodern thoughts. This vicissitude of the theories sparked multiple controversies among many sociologists of education in Japan. Irrespective of this, little is known about why over several decades, there are still two issues pertinent to the theories, the passivity of theory construction to grasp the entire society and the absence of the main theory in this academic realm. Revealing the factor that results in these two can contribute to further studies of Japan's sociology of education attempting to invoke Western theories. The purpose of this study, thus, is to elucidate a factor that appears to engender these two issues, from the perspective of the lapse of the “Modernization Theory” which is later defined as the “Post Modernization Theory”, to view the notional distinction between Structural Functionalism and Functional Theory. The lapse of the Modernization Theory is adopted in this study, as both Functional Theory and Structural Functionalism percolated over the then sociologists of education behind the view of Japan’s modern society. Subsequently, given that functional theory is known to partly entrench the academic identity of Japan’s sociology of education, considering how the acceptance and transition from functionalism to functional theory occurred in Japan is meaningful. After this work, this study explores the relationship between Functional Theory and Paradigm Shift Controversy, a phenomenon of influx of Western theories that made the orthodox of the traditional theories dubious, from the perspective of the “Post Modernization Theory”. All of the above processes will suggest that the lapse of the “Modernization Theory”, in other words, the failure to position "Post-Modernization Theory" in Japanese sociology of education, is the factor leading to the passivity of theory construction and absence of mainstream theory today. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科 教育科学専攻 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | The Students of Graduate School of Education and Human Development the Department of Educational Sciences, Nagoya University | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプresource | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18999/kyor.68.1 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0288-996X | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 教育論叢 en : Kyoiku-ronso 巻 68, p. 1-10, 発行日 2025-03-31 |
|||||||||
