| アイテムタイプ |
itemtype_ver1(1) |
| 公開日 |
2026-03-03 |
| タイトル |
|
|
タイトル |
Estimated fetal weight or gestational age: which is crucial for fetal cardiac evaluation? |
|
言語 |
en |
| 著者 |
Tano, Sho
Inamura, Tatsuo
Kato, Mina
Ito, Manami
Takeda, Takehiko
Kinoshita, Fumie
Fuma, Kazuya
Matsuo, Seiko
Ushida, Takafumi
Imai, Kenji
Kajiyama, Hiroaki
Kotani, Tomomi
Kishigami, Yasuyuki
Oguchi, Hidenori
|
| アクセス権 |
|
|
アクセス権 |
embargoed access |
|
アクセス権URI |
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf |
| 権利 |
|
|
権利情報 |
This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04584-y |
|
言語 |
en |
| 内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Abstract |
|
内容記述 |
Background: Fetal cardiac output is typically assessed using gestational age (GA) or estimated fetal weight (EFW), but the optimal reference remains unclear due to limited validation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from singleton fetuses at 27 + 2 to 29 + 6 weeks of gestation. Subjects included those with small for gestational age (SGA; EFW <10th percentile), large for gestational age (LGA; EFW > 90th percentile), and appropriate for gestational age (AGA), all without structural abnormalities. Associations between fetal cardiac output and both GA and EFW were evaluated using generalized additive models. Results: Among 443 fetuses with EFWs ranging from 873 to 1631 g, GA showed no significant association with any cardiac parameter (p ≥ 0.282). In contrast, EFW demonstrated significant and largely linear associations with all parameters (p < 0.001, F ≥ 16.7), consistent across GA and EFW ranges. Cardiac parameter distributions by EFW were similar across AGA, SGA, and LGA groups. Conclusion: EFW showed stronger and more consistent correlations with fetal cardiac parameters than GA, supporting its use as a more reliable reference for fetal cardiac evaluation across different growth statuses. |
|
言語 |
en |
| 内容記述 |
|
|
内容記述タイプ |
Other |
|
内容記述 |
Version of record: 26 November 2025 |
|
言語 |
en |
| 出版者 |
|
|
出版者 |
SpringerNature |
|
言語 |
en |
| 言語 |
|
|
言語 |
eng |
| 資源タイプ |
|
|
資源タイプresource |
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
|
タイプ |
journal article |
| 出版タイプ |
|
|
出版タイプ |
AM |
|
出版タイプResource |
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |
| 関連情報 |
|
|
関連タイプ |
isVersionOf |
|
|
識別子タイプ |
DOI |
|
|
関連識別子 |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04584-y |
| 収録物識別子 |
|
|
収録物識別子タイプ |
PISSN |
|
収録物識別子 |
0031-3998 |
| 書誌情報 |
en : Pediatric research
発行日 2025-11-26
|
| ファイル公開日 |
|
|
日付 |
2026-05-26 |
|
日付タイプ |
Available |