ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 刊行物
  3. NAGOYA STUDIES IN INDIAN CULTURE AND BUDDHISM : SAṂBHĀṢĀ
  4. 39

Epistemology of Buddhist Perception: Some Problems

https://doi.org/10.18999/sambh.39.1
https://doi.org/10.18999/sambh.39.1
0e2536f7-7a68-48c6-ae3e-67791fa3ce27
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
sambh_39_1.pdf sambh_39_1.pdf (76.0 KB)
アイテムタイプ itemtype_ver1(1)
公開日 2026-03-27
タイトル
タイトル Epistemology of Buddhist Perception: Some Problems
言語 en
著者 GHOSH, Raghunath

× GHOSH, Raghunath

en GHOSH, Raghunath

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 pramā
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 pramāṇa
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 saṃvādaka
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 upadarśita
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 adhyavasāya
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The paper deals with the problem whether the property of being uncontradicted (avisaṃvādakatva) is inconsistent to the phenomenon of momentariness admitted by the Buddhists. One may raise a question that an uncontradicted experience cannot be known within a moment (kṣaṇa). Hence to admit cognition as uncontradicted is to accept its non-momentary character. Though a different object is apprehended altogether yet we have a strong and definite cognition (adhyavasāya) in the form – ‘the object which is perceived is apprehended’ (dṛṣṭam eva prāptam). It is the case of the attainment of what has been perceived (pratītaprāpaṇa). To the Buddhists a wise man comes to know of an object by means of clearer perception (paṭutarapratyakṣa). As soon as it is attained, he comes to know of its causal efficacy at the same moment. Had there been no cognition of knowledge and its causal efficacy simultaneously, there would have been no reliability on cognition. Dharmottara has justified the first and second order causal efficacy with the following example. One can know of the existence of a jar and its utility or causal efficacy being pointed out by other at the first level which is called upadarśita or saṃvādaka. Afterwards, the same person can go and directly know the jar which is called second order causal efficacy. Hence there is no inconsistency in their thought
言語 en
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学大学院人文学研究科インド哲学分野・専門(研究室)
言語 ja
出版者
出版者 Department of Indian Philosophy, Graduate School of Humanities, Nagoya University
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源タイプresource http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/sambh.39.1
ID登録タイプ JaLC
収録物識別子
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0285-7154
書誌情報 en : NAGOYA STUDIES IN INDIAN CULTURE AND BUDDHISM : SAṂBHĀṢĀ

巻 39, p. 1-13, 発行日 2026-03-15
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2026-03-27 05:59:42.096980
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3