@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002066, author = {大橋, 正夫 and OHASHI, Masao and 吉田, 俊和 and YOSHIDA, Toshikazu and 鹿内, 啓子 and SHIKANAI, Keiko and 平林, 進 and HIRABAYASHI, Susumu and 林, 文俊 and HAYASHI, Fumitoshi and 津村, 俊充 and TSUMURA, Toshimitsu and 小川, 浩 and OGAWA, Hiroshi}, journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科}, month = {Nov}, note = {This study examines what relation people assume between physiognomic and personality characteristics and why they have such assumed relations, through more direct method than the one in the former study. Twenty-five pairs of opposite physiognomic characteristics (A-A^^^-) and 10 pairs of opposite personality traits (X-X^^^-) were used. They made two hundred and fifty combinations of physiognomic pair-personality pair, which were devided into ten groups of twenty-five combinations by Latin square. Thirty-four, thirty-five, or thirty-six subjects (female university students) were assigned to each group. On each combination of physiognomy pair-personality pair, subjects were asked at first to draw a line between the words printed if they believe that there was any relation between a physiognomic characteristic and a personality trait, and then to describe the reason for the relation. Subjects were instructed to imagine a person of the same sex and age to them. The results are as follows. 1) One hundred and thirty-four combinations of the overall (54.0%) showed significant assumed relation. This figure is lower than that obtained in former study which used rating method. However, current and former studies presented quite consistent results in spite of their different methods. One hundred and ninty-three of overall combinations (77.2%) were consistent and only one combination was inconsistent between both studies in their assumed relations. 2) From overall combination, ten which showed strong relations in one direction, and six combinations which showed relations in two direction evenly were selected for the content analysis of reasons for the assumed relations. From preliminary analysis of these sixteen combinations, six categories of the type for the reasoning were established. They were Intuition, Induction, Metaphor, Mediation, Logic, and Evaluation/Affection types. Seven judges classified 334 descriptions written on these 16 combinations into six categories. The proportion of the number of agreed judgements between a couple of judges were ranged between 53.7% and 80.9%, and 69.1% as average. This suggests that six categories may be reliably used for classification of the reasoning for the assumed relations. 3) Subjects seemed to have difficulty in describing the reasons. Such verbal description may be not adequate to elucidate the implicit relations between physiognomic and personality characteristics. Subjects' descriptions of the reasons for assumed relations and interpretations of their descriptions in terms of six categories were fully presented., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。}, pages = {23--33}, title = {<原著>相貌と性格の仮定された関連性 (2)}, volume = {24}, year = {1977} }