@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002104, author = {梶田, 正巳 and 大野木, 裕明 and 吉田, 直子 and 塩田, 勢津子 and 中島, 実 and 中野, 靖彦}, journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科}, month = {Dec}, note = {The ability to attend selectively to critical stimulus features and ignore others is an important part of children's learning processes. Up to now, it has been conceptualized differently in various theories and operationalized differently by different experimenters. These analyses have emphasized the role of attention in children's learning, suggesting developmental improvement in the efficient use of selective attention. We have attempted to review two paradigms of researches, incidental learning and component selection. First of all we have discussed methodological differences between the two. The main comparisons of them are as follows. 1) Procedure : In incidental learning, children are required by experimenters to learn the central task only. One stimulus feature is defined as central and the other as incidental. On the other hand, the stimulus components are redundant in component selection task, and subjects can serve as functional cues. 2) Task : In a paradigm of incidental learning, Hagen and collaborators used a short-term memory task. In a paradigm of component selection, many reserchers used paired-associate learning task. A variety of developmental studies has found incidental learning either to increase or remain constant until the 12-14 years of age and then decline (Hagen, 1972). Furthermore, there is a positive correlation between central learning and incidental learning at younger ages and a negative correlation between these measures at later age (Druker & Hagen, 1969; Hagen, 1972). But only a few reseaches have been conducted concerning the possible association between incidental learning paradigm and other paradigms in view of attention processes. The possibility of research to selective attention processes was also discussed. There are only 6 studies in component selection paradigm. We reviewed the literatures from following aspects. 1) developmental study : comparison with incidental learning 2) the relation between components 3) degrees of learning Finally, we discussed problems of selective attention, suggesting new hypotheses and a reformation concerning the two paradigms., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。}, pages = {205--221}, title = {<原著>選択的注意の最近の研究 : 偶発学習と成素選択パラダイムの諸問題}, volume = {25}, year = {1978} }