{"_buckets": {"deposit": "b59055f9-ce62-4dea-bd8b-d265c64acb13"}, "_deposit": {"id": "21232", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "21232"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00021232", "sets": ["1817"]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2015-12-25", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "83", "bibliographicPageStart": "43", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "264", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "名古屋大學法政論集"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The long-awaited – the first investment treaty arbitration to deny its jurisdiction because of corruption – came in 2013 in the arbitration case involving Uzbekistan and the Israeli investor Metal-Tech. Until this time, there was plenty of speculation about the role of investment treaty arbitration on corruption, burden and standard of proof, legality requirement and so on. Metal-Tech Tribunal clarified many unexplored legal questions that have tremendous impact to the following investment arbitrations and also investors doing a business with corrupt governments in the world. Although the Metal-Tech Tribunal was widely credited for sua sponte use of its investigation powers in corruption-alleged case, however, in the substantive matters it also has a significant role for the development of ICSID jurisprudence. Therefore, it has a potential to stand as a ‘precedent’ for the future arbitration on corruption allegations.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/23373"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/nujlp.264.2", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学大学院法学研究科"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN（print）", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0439-5905", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "ALISHER, Umirdinov"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "61327", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "nujlp_264_2.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "281.2 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 281200.0, "url": {"label": "nujlp_264_2.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/21232/files/nujlp_264_2.pdf"}, "version_id": "f88f173c-6d48-425b-ab6f-8fb0827057e8"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "foreign investment", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "arbitration", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "corruption", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "illegality", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Sharing Responsibilities on Corruption Allegations in Investor-State Arbitration : The Contribution of Metal-Tech v. Uzbekistan", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Sharing Responsibilities on Corruption Allegations in Investor-State Arbitration : The Contribution of Metal-Tech v. Uzbekistan"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["1817"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/nujlp.264.2", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2016-01-18"}, "publish_date": "2016-01-18", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "21232", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Sharing Responsibilities on Corruption Allegations in Investor-State Arbitration : The Contribution of Metal-Tech v. Uzbekistan"], "weko_shared_id": null}