@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00021232,
 author = {ALISHER, Umirdinov},
 journal = {名古屋大學法政論集},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {The long-awaited – the first investment treaty arbitration to deny its jurisdiction because of corruption – came in 2013 in the arbitration case involving Uzbekistan and the Israeli investor Metal-Tech. Until this time, there was plenty of speculation about the role of investment treaty arbitration on corruption, burden and standard of proof, legality requirement and so on. Metal-Tech Tribunal clarified many unexplored legal questions that have tremendous impact to the following investment arbitrations and also investors doing a business with corrupt governments in the world. Although the Metal-Tech Tribunal was widely credited for sua sponte use of its investigation powers in corruption-alleged case, however, in the substantive matters it also has a significant role for the development of ICSID jurisprudence. Therefore, it has a potential to stand as a ‘precedent’ for the future arbitration on corruption allegations.},
 pages = {43--83},
 title = {Sharing Responsibilities on Corruption Allegations in Investor-State Arbitration : The Contribution of Metal-Tech v. Uzbekistan},
 volume = {264},
 year = {2015}
}