@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002172,
 author = {増井, 透 and MASUI, Tooru and 川崎, 惠里子 and KAWASAKI, Eriko},
 journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {Early researches concerning story grammars predicted that recall for statements in stories varied as a function of their hierarchical level. The rewrite rules of a story grammar assign automatically each statement to story categories of nodes and relates nodes structurally. Thorndyke (1977) and other researchers in fact reported that statements relatively subordinate in the structural hierarchy were poorer recalled. We have conducted experiments to test whether three kinds of performances concerned memory and comprehension, i. e., recall, summary and importance ratings predicted as a function of levels in hierarchy generated by story grammar and relational density. However, except summarization protocols, those performances were sometimes, but not always predicted by such levels. Those results suggested that memory and comprehension processes had to be distinguished, and that the semantic content and the relationship between story statements were apparently more critical for predicating memory performances. In the previous experiments, we generated 17 story variations from the original story whether deleting one story category or several statements across categories. Those variations were categorized according to their rated comprehensibility. High and Low comprehensible stories were selected, and after learning stories in natural or scrambled order, recognition test were performed. Another subjects were given a recall test after three different retention intervals. The main results were as follows : 1) Comprehensibility depended on what node categories were involved. 2) Varying the structure by category or statement deletion, rated importance even for the same statement also could be varied. 3) RT (ORI) was fastest for H and latest for L comprehensibility respectively. 4) RT (OLD) and importance ratings (IR) related each other. 5) The longer the retention interval, the more recall ability of each story categories became to resemble IR as a function of categories. Those results suggested that each statement located as a semantic composition of structural configration., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。},
 pages = {61--70},
 title = {<原著>物語の記憶と理解における処理過程 II : 物語構造の操作},
 volume = {28},
 year = {1981}
}