@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002177, author = {池田, 博和 and IKEDA, Hirokazu and 伊藤, 義美 and ITOH, Yoshimi and 田畑, 治 and TABATA, Osamu}, journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科}, month = {Dec}, note = {The onset of a anthropophobia is in adolescence, particularly at the beginning of junior high school age without exception. In this meaning, it may be as well to say this mental disorder is most genuine adolescent crisis. In the developmental stage of adolescence, human beings will become to wake up to a separation of "for self" (fur sich) and "in itself" (an sich). Though these aspects of self have been represented in various concepts e. g. "transcendent self and empirical self" (Balnkenburg, W.), "self of Noesis and self of Noema" (Kimura, B.) or "ontological self and empirical self" (Laing, R. D.) and so on, briefly speaking, it seems they mean "the self as the experiencing agent" and "the self as what is known". In an adolescence the self should be divided into both aspects and moreover they must be no more and no less integrated as a unity. The anthropophobia is a state that unnaturally unintegrated self become a serious problem in context of interpersonal relations, being confronted by such an adolescent task. That is, we think the anthropophobia as a problem of unintegration of "self representation" ("Sichdarleben"-Blankenburg, W.) in company, especially in a dimension of preintentional realm such as "Ki" or "asthetischer Erlebnisbereich" (Zutt, J.). The focus of this study is placed on to clear up these psychopathological points of anthropophobic symptoms, and we would like to evident what mode of Sichderleben become problematic in human relation from the light of anthropological theory of schizophrenia. In this paper, we present phenomenological descriptions about 6 cases of the anthropophobia, then in the next paper, we want to discuss those cases in connection with the literature on this subject and examine them synthetically from our points of view of clinical adolescent psychology. Case 1 and case 2 belong to the sphere of the borderline case, because a schizophrenic process can be found on the basis of neurotic defense in them. Case 1 persists in severe symptom formation as a defense, by contrast, case 2 is confronted with a problem of selfness of self (identity). Case 3-6 can be regarded within the range of the neurosis. They are arranged in order of seriousness of their pathology, for we attempt to approach to the normalcy from the abnormality., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。}, pages = {189--208}, title = {<原著>臨床青年心理学研究 (VIII) : 対人恐怖の人間学, その 1 , 症例提起}, volume = {28}, year = {1981} }