WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "d5f09bea-d2ac-4d45-a766-44cc092178b0"}, "_deposit": {"id": "21778", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "21778"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00021778", "sets": []}, "author_link": ["64944"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2015-12", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "2", "bibliographicPageEnd": "47", "bibliographicPageStart": "39", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "4", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "NU ideas", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "A research paper is essentially about providing well-argued support and/or counterevidence for a claim or thesis statement. As such, it is hard to overstate the importance of understanding how to create a thesis statement. Yet constructing one from scratch can be most challenging for a new researcher. In this paper, we will look at the necessary elements for constructing a thesis statement, and the consequences if one of these elements is missing or mistaken for the thesis statement itself. Other methods have suggested steps (i.e. brainstorming) that a researcher could take leading up to the formation of a thesis statement. These approaches, although useful, do not discuss necessary elements for constructing a thesis statement. In the present work, I propose that before a thesis statement is built, it is essential to have: 1) an observed phenomenon, followed by 2) a research question. Creating these two elements first will lead directly to the construction of a meaningful thesis statement. Many new researchers have trouble progressing beyond the observed phenomenon stage. This often leads to a paper that devotes most of its pages to categorizing or describing parts of a phenomenon, which leaves the writer no choice but to end the paper with a summary, rather than a conclusion. Additionally, when a researcher stops short of creating a thesis statement but formulates a research question, the research question (in many cases stated as an objective) can be mistaken for the thesis statement, or the researcher inadvertently creates the risk of post hoc reasoning (i.e. data dredging or the Texas sharpshooter fallacy) when interpreting results.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Academic Writing and Critical Thinking (21st February, 2015)", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "URI", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://nuideas.ilas.nagoya-u.ac.jp/Volume4/4-4_contents.html"}, {"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/23932"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/nuid.4.2.39", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学教養教育院", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_9_relation_43": {"attribute_name": "関連情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type": "isVersionOf", "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "http://nuideas.ilas.nagoya-u.ac.jp/Volume4/4-4_contents.html", "subitem_relation_type_select": "URI"}}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_61": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(Online)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "2186-3660", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "EISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Hamlitsch, Nathan", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "64944", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "4-4_Hamlitsch.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "536.1 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 536100.0, "url": {"label": "4-4_Hamlitsch.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/21778/files/4-4_Hamlitsch.pdf"}, "version_id": "6b029194-f4ad-4060-8938-6a9b5d46164a"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "The necessities for building a thesis statement", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "The necessities for building a thesis statement", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["1840"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/nuid.4.2.39", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2016-03-28"}, "publish_date": "2016-03-28", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "21778", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["The necessities for building a thesis statement"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
The necessities for building a thesis statement
https://doi.org/10.18999/nuid.4.2.39
https://doi.org/10.18999/nuid.4.2.39617b7ebd-a19f-449b-a2d3-0079753a7f4c
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2016-03-28 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | The necessities for building a thesis statement | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
著者 |
Hamlitsch, Nathan
× Hamlitsch, Nathan |
|||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述 | A research paper is essentially about providing well-argued support and/or counterevidence for a claim or thesis statement. As such, it is hard to overstate the importance of understanding how to create a thesis statement. Yet constructing one from scratch can be most challenging for a new researcher. In this paper, we will look at the necessary elements for constructing a thesis statement, and the consequences if one of these elements is missing or mistaken for the thesis statement itself. Other methods have suggested steps (i.e. brainstorming) that a researcher could take leading up to the formation of a thesis statement. These approaches, although useful, do not discuss necessary elements for constructing a thesis statement. In the present work, I propose that before a thesis statement is built, it is essential to have: 1) an observed phenomenon, followed by 2) a research question. Creating these two elements first will lead directly to the construction of a meaningful thesis statement. Many new researchers have trouble progressing beyond the observed phenomenon stage. This often leads to a paper that devotes most of its pages to categorizing or describing parts of a phenomenon, which leaves the writer no choice but to end the paper with a summary, rather than a conclusion. Additionally, when a researcher stops short of creating a thesis statement but formulates a research question, the research question (in many cases stated as an objective) can be mistaken for the thesis statement, or the researcher inadvertently creates the risk of post hoc reasoning (i.e. data dredging or the Texas sharpshooter fallacy) when interpreting results. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述 | Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Academic Writing and Critical Thinking (21st February, 2015) | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | 名古屋大学教養教育院 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.18999/nuid.4.2.39 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
関連情報 | ||||||
関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
関連識別子 | http://nuideas.ilas.nagoya-u.ac.jp/Volume4/4-4_contents.html | |||||
ISSN(Online) | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 2186-3660 | |||||
書誌情報 |
en : NU ideas 巻 4, 号 2, p. 39-47, 発行日 2015-12 |
|||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://nuideas.ilas.nagoya-u.ac.jp/Volume4/4-4_contents.html | |||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/2237/23932 | |||||
識別子タイプ | HDL |