@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002217,
 author = {大橋, 正夫 and OHASHI, Masao and 林, 文俊 and HAYASHI, Fumitoshi and 廣岡, 秀一 and HIROOKA, Shuichi},
 journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {Since Bruner & Tagiuri (1954) and Cronbach (1955) proposed a concept of "implicit personality theory" (IPT) to describe perceivers' assumed inferential relations among personality traits, investigators have employed various statistical models to represent such subjective relational systems. In the present study, two factor-analytic models of IPT, one based on "common scales method" and the other based on "individual scales method", were compared with each other. Twenty-five undergraduates (13 males and 12 females) were asked to rate thirty-one peers both on their own "individual scales" and on "common scales" (20 scales in each occasion). For each subject, two 20 x 20 intertrait correlation matrices from both types of ratings were factor-analyzed. In addition, ratings of "common scales" were aggregated across the different subjects Major findings obtained are as follows: (1) In "common scales method", range of numbers of factors extracted was three to seven. These factor structures of individual subjects' ratings were moderately congruent with the structure made by a group of subjects. (2) Structural properties in one's IPT were analyzed according to the procedure illustrated by Cronbach (1955, 1958). And it was suggested that Cronbach's method was a usefull tool for analyzing IPT. (3) Contents of the factors extracted in "individual scales method" varied widely. About three fourths of these factors, however, were able to be interpreted as connected with the "fondamental three dimensions in perceiving personality" (Hayashi, 1978). Forthermore, implications of individual differences in these factor structures for the concept of IPT were discussed., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。},
 pages = {1--26},
 title = {暗黙裡の性格観に関する研究(II) : 共通尺度法と個別尺度法の比較検討},
 volume = {30},
 year = {1983}
}