@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00022845,
 author = {宮島, 良子 and MIYAJIMA, Ryoko},
 journal = {Nagoya University Asian Law Bulletin},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {This research paper aims to shed further light on the education methods which are used while assessing the Japanese language writing skills of foreign students enrolled in the Research and Education Center for Japanese Law (CJL). The present study is based on qualitative analysis of how two law lecturers with different backgrounds (one, a researcher with a theory based background, and the other a practicing lawyer) rated short essay responses for the Examination for Japanese University Admission for International Students by three Cambodian students who had studied in CJL for one and a half years. The law lecturers were firstly asked to conduct an assessment of the essays while thinking out loud. After this evaluation had been carried out, a stimulated recall method was used in combination with a semi-structured interview and the speech protocols were collected. The speech protocols were analyzed though the Steps for Coding and Theorization (SCAT) approach. The results were coded into seven common categories: relative evaluation, conscious division of labor based on difference of expertise, suitability of written response, importance of structure, logical consistency, authenticity of information, and self-meta-assessment. Through this experimental study, it has been possible to gain some insight from an analysis of the story lines and theoretical description of what is sought from a Japanese language instructor when working with law lecturers.},
 pages = {82--94},
 title = {日本法教育研究センターで学ぶ学生たちのライティングをどう評価するか ： 法学講師の評価プロトコルから見えてくるもの},
 volume = {1},
 year = {2016}
}