{"created":"2021-03-01T06:31:30.855317+00:00","id":23640,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"0f503116-c3e9-4ad2-ae00-efdd7a2d2cb6"},"_deposit":{"id":"23640","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"23640"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00023640","sets":["748:749:750:1959"]},"author_link":["98070","98071"],"item_1615768549627":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_9_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"A Case Study on the Gaps in Institutional Evaluation and Planning","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_9_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2017-03","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"137","bibliographicPageStart":"123","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"17","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"名古屋高等教育研究","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿の目的は、米国の中規模州立大学の事例を通して、評価と改善計画の断絶が生じるメカニズムと、組織におけるその意味を考察することである。一般に、評価と改善計画は合理的で整合的であることが望ましいと考えられているが、それが常に組織のパフォーマンスを高めるとは限らない。本稿では、一見すると評価と改善計画が断絶されているものの、背後にある構成員間の相互作用に注目すると、断絶が組織のパフォーマンスを必ずしも低くするとはいえないことを示した。主な結論は、以下の通りである。第1に、IR室等から提供されるデータは、全てが評価において活用されないものの、評価に参加する構成員の相互作用を促すために活用される。第2に、評価や改善計画は一定程度儀礼的に取り組まれ、組織にとって重要な課題と切り離される。第3に、組織にとって重要な課題を、構成員間の相互作用を通じて内面化することで、儀礼的な評価や改善計画が組織の統合に有効に作用する可能性がある。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"This paper aims to report on a case study of a state university inthe U.S., describing how institutional evaluations and strategicplanning presumably work dissonantly but make sense of eventsamong people who participated in the evaluation process. From theviewpoint of the positivist paradigms, data analysis, institutionalself-study, and future projection must be connected logically underrational explanations. However, emphasis on the rationality andconsistency between evaluation and planning does not necessarilybring about institutional effectiveness. This paper re-examines theprocess of evaluation and planning as a socially constructed narrativethat has a positive impact on organizational integration.The main findings are as follows. First, all data and evidenceprovided by the office of institutional research are not examinedthoroughly but questioned partially to facilitate interactions amongmembers of the evaluation committee for collective understanding ofthe issues. Second, the process of appraisal and projections aredecoupled from central issues in the institution and accomplishedsymbolically. Third, focusing on interaction to develop diverseinterpretations of fact and data has a significant effect onorganizational integration.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.18999/njhe.17.123","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_32":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"名古屋大学高等教育研究センター","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_9_select_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_9_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN（print）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1348-2459","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"中島, 英博","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"98070","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"NAKAJIMA, Hidehiro","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"98071","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-02-22"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"08.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.3 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"08.pdf","objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/23640/files/08.pdf"},"version_id":"2941f07e-04e8-4aa0-8e8f-c58617b9f931"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"大学組織内における評価と改善計画の断絶に関する事例研究","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"大学組織内における評価と改善計画の断絶に関する事例研究","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"1","path":["1959"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2017-03-30"},"publish_date":"2017-03-30","publish_status":"0","recid":"23640","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["大学組織内における評価と改善計画の断絶に関する事例研究"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-01-16T04:13:30.296106+00:00"}