@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00002543,
 author = {森, 久美子 and Mori, Kumiko},
 journal = {名古屋大學教育學部紀要. 教育心理学科},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {The present study was designed to determine the effectiveness of decomposed game procedure to assess social orientations. The specific purposes of this study were as follows : (1) to examine the validity of standards for classification of dominant social orientation, and (2) to assess whether fairness, especially equality operates as a fourth motive in determining subjects' decision rule. One hundred and fifty-nine college students participated in a series of decomposed games, and were classified into four social orientations (i. e., cooperation, fairness, individualism, and competition) by means of Kuhlman & Marshello (1975) procedure. Subjects' orientations also analyzed by a quantification method of the third type and clustering procedure. The clustering procedure generated five clusters (including a group of subjects whose orientations were not identified) corresponded with the groups obtained by procedure used in prior research. This result considered as a support for the validity of the social orientation assessment procedures in use. Although egalitarian orientation was distinguished from cooperative one, this could not be taken as evidence for egalitarian motives, because egalitarians did not differ much from cooperators in their response pattern., 国立情報学研究所で電子化したコンテンツを使用している。},
 pages = {179--193},
 title = {社会的志向性の測定},
 volume = {42},
 year = {1995}
}