{"created":"2021-03-01T06:33:59.913826+00:00","id":26105,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"a7997357-fef8-42db-a226-e24a84a59907"},"_deposit":{"id":"26105","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"26105"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00026105","sets":["312:491:678:2080"]},"author_link":["78315","78316"],"item_1615768549627":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_9_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Bradley's Theory of Judgment and Early Russell's Conception of Judgment","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_9_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2018-06-21","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"25","bibliographicPageStart":"16","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"13","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"Nagoya journal of philosophy","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"This paper is an attempt to cast light on an idea shared by F. H. Bradley and Bertrand Russell even after the latter revolted against the former's monistic idealism. I argue that both accepted, at least when the latter completed A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, the idea that every judgment has a state of affairs as its content, where a state of affairs is understood as part of the universe that can be described by a declarative sentence. First, I attempt to show that Russell's tacit acceptance of the idea underlies his claim, developed in the commentary on Leibniz, that if every judgment comprises a subject and a predicate, there can be at most one substance. I then turn to Bradley's thought, arguing that the idea is an immediate consequence of the central tenet of his theory of judgment: every judgment ascribes a universal to reality. Finally, to show that he was indeed aware of the consequence, I introduce what he called the 'problem of error'.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"ファイル公開日：2018年6月21日","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.18999/nagjp.13.16","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_32":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"名古屋大学情報科学研究科情報創造論講座","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_9_relation_43":{"attribute_name":"関連情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type":"isVersionOf","subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"http://www.is.nagoya-u.ac.jp/dep-ss/phil/todayama/njp.html","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_9_select_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_9_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN（print）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1882-1634","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"伊藤, 遼","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"78315","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Ito, Ryo","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"78316","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-06-21"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"02 Ryo-Ito-NJP13(16-25).pdf","filesize":[{"value":"263.9 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"02 Ryo-Ito-NJP13(16-25)","objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/26105/files/02 Ryo-Ito-NJP13(16-25).pdf"},"version_id":"63e325be-96dd-4ffb-a2b4-03d00d79f06f"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"ブラッドリーの判断論と初期ラッセルの判断概念","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"ブラッドリーの判断論と初期ラッセルの判断概念","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"1","path":["2080"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2018-06-21"},"publish_date":"2018-06-21","publish_status":"0","recid":"26105","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["ブラッドリーの判断論と初期ラッセルの判断概念"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-01-16T04:24:01.045088+00:00"}