{"created":"2021-03-01T06:34:23.516269+00:00","id":26471,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"cb25e62c-d6d8-4c72-88b7-01be093b6056"},"_deposit":{"id":"26471","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"26471"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00026471","sets":["323:324:325"]},"author_link":["565","87175"],"item_10_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Style of Reasoning and Cultivation of Political Literacy in France: A Comparison with the United States","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_10_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2017-06-30","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicPageEnd":"191","bibliographicPageStart":"180","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"84","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"教育学研究","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿は日本の政治教育でも習得が求められている政治的教養とその育成を、フランスを例にひとつのモデルとして提示する。政治的知識は「合意された手段」を使って権利を行使するための知識と技術を指すが、政治的教養はそれらの知識・技術を使って判断したり実際の政治行動に結びつけたりする「価値」をも視野にいれたものと定義する。フランスでは合意を得る手段として、歴史を根拠にことばの定義を行い、異なる視点を突き合わせてその矛盾を解決する〈弁証法〉が書いたり討論したりする方法として用いられており、初等教育からこの様式習得のための教育が行われている。この思考と表現の型―思考表現スタイル―に歴史教育が根拠となる「材料」を提供し、市民性教育が「概念」を与え、フランス語教育が「感情」を育み、それらが統合されて政治的教養が習得される過程をフランスの学校調査から明らかにする。結論では政治教育における3 つの課題―(1)主体性の育成と教育の価値中立性、(2)生徒の政治行動への準備、(3)多元的な社会における政治教育―にフランスのモデルがいかに応えているかを示す。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"Using France as an example, this paper proposes a model for the cultivation of political literacy. In this paper, “political literacy” is defi ned as encompassing “political knowledge” as well as the values, based upon which individuals make judgments that lead to actual political action. In France, a dialectical method that includes writing and discussion is used as a means of reaching consensus. Students first define the terms under discussion (such as “racism”) based on numerous examples from history, then compare differing viewpoints, and address and resolve their contradictions. French students are consciously educated to master this style of reasoning in various subjects from elementary school through the end of secondary education. While it appears to be simply “a style” of reasoning, this style socializes students to think, represent, overcome contradictions, and ultimately act upon correcting political errors according to the logic of this style. Drawing from the author’s research of French schools, this paper elucidates the process by which students acquire political literacy. History education provides the grounds for argument, while citizenship education provides the concepts required for the above-described “style of reasoning.” Together with the emotions cultivated in French-language and literature education, these are then integrated to form the political literacy acquisition process. In conclusion, the way in which the French model addresses the following three issues in political education is presented: (1) How can students’ political initiative be cultivated while maintaining a value-neutral education? (2) How can students be prepared for actual political action? (3) Is it possible to provide a uniform political education for students from diverse socio- economic and cultural backgrounds? In both the structure of French-style essays (dissertation) as well as French-style discussions, one finds an emphasis on a similar set of procedures. By using these agreed-upon procedures, it becomes possible to engage in dialogue and for consensus to be reached between people who have diverse cultural backgrounds, values, and aims. At the same time, the basic style of reasoning also serves as an important means by which individuals can think freely in a multi-dimensional fashion. Cultivating a student’s political initiative while maintaining political neutrality is seen as diffi cult because there are many cases in which the former goal confl icts with the latter means of teaching. However, the French method of respecting the means while not paying attention to the goals of individuals skillfully avoids the diffi - culty surrounding this goal/means confl ict in political education. In France, the aim of discussions is not to persuade or defeat one’s opponent, but to create a common culture (culture commune) for each individual discussion via the process of defi ning the words in question. In Japan, an American style of reasoning, such as American-style essays and debates, has been used as a model for political education. By presenting the French model in comparison to that of the US, it becomes possible to relativize the latter and show the validity of the alternative model. This would certainly provide an opportunity to build our own style of reasoning as the means of reaching consensus, as well as expressing thoughts in both political education and the actual field of politics.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10_publisher_32":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"一般社団法人 日本教育学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10_relation_11":{"attribute_name":"DOI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type":"isVersionOf","subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"https://doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku.84.2_180","subitem_relation_type_select":"DOI"}}]},"item_10_rights_12":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"(c) 日本教育学会","subitem_rights_language":"ja"}]},"item_10_select_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_10_source_id_61":{"attribute_name":"ISSN（print）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0387-3161","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_1615787544753":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"渡邉, 雅子","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"565","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"WATANABE, Msako Ema","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"87175","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-10-17"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"84_180.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"567.8 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"84_180","objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/26471/files/84_180.pdf"},"version_id":"ff0a2b02-77bb-429d-9bdd-1a53b5d6f557"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"能力と教養","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"政治教育","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"市民性教育","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"フランスの思考表現スタイル","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"合意形成","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"political literacy","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"political education","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"civic education","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"style of reasoning","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"consensus building","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"France","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"journal article","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"フランスの思考表現スタイルと政治的教養の育成 : アメリカとの比較から","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"フランスの思考表現スタイルと政治的教養の育成 : アメリカとの比較から","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10","owner":"1","path":["325"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2018-10-17"},"publish_date":"2018-10-17","publish_status":"0","recid":"26471","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["フランスの思考表現スタイルと政治的教養の育成 : アメリカとの比較から"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-01-16T04:17:03.001834+00:00"}