@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027892, author = {Nakago, Kay}, journal = {IVY}, month = {Oct}, note = {The purpose of this paper is to show that it is possible to treat the configurational properties of both extraposed phrases and secondary predicates in a parralel way. It is generally assumed that subject-oriented extraposed phrases (SXs) are adjoined to IP, and object-oriented extraposed phrases (OXs) to VP. In Rochemont and Culicover (1990), it is argued that the locality restrictions on extraposed phrases are due to the Complement Principle. I basically agree with the idea, but the problematic point of the principle is that it wrongly predicts VP adjunction of SXs. Therefore, we need to revise the principle. In Nakajima (1990b), subject-oriented secondary predicates (SPs) are shown to adjoin to IP, and object-oriented secondary predicates (OPs) to VP. Therefore, a secondary predicate should mutually m-command its subject. It is striking to note, at this point, that secondary predicates and extraposed phrases show similar behavior. Specifically, subject-oriented elements (SXs and SPs) adjoin to IP, while object-oriented elements (OXs and OPs) to VP. Based on these facts, I propose the Extended Complement Principle : (1) Extended Complement Principle, α is the associate of β (α, β=X^max), only if α and β are in a mutual m-command relation. In order to make correct predictions, I also show that adjunction is conducted not through Chomsky-adjunction but through daughter-adjunction. The daughter-­adjoined configuration is essentially the same in spirit with Carrier and Randall (1992) who claim that a verb, a postverbal NP, and a result XP must all be sisters, in a ternary-branching VP., This is a revised version of the paper read at the 33rd Annual meeting of the Society of English Literature and Linguistics Nagoya University (SELN) held at Nagoya University on April 23, 1994.}, pages = {107--124}, title = {A Comprehensive Approach towards Extraposition and Predication}, volume = {27}, year = {1994} }