ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "987511f9-a149-4d72-9c73-f05cc164c622"}, "_deposit": {"id": "27898", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "27898"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027898", "sets": ["2386"]}, "author_link": ["90683", "90684"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "Two Types of Cognate Object Constructions", "subitem_alternative_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1995-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "132", "bibliographicPageStart": "113", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "28", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "IVY", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper is concerned with sentences called cognate object constructions illustrated in (1). (1) a. She laughed a hearty laugh. b. She sang a song. It has been claimed that cognate object constructions are devided into two classes depending on their different syntactic behaviors (cf. Yasui (1983)). One is called the adverbial cognate object construction and the other the objective cognate object construction (henceforth, ACOC and OCOC). Objects in OCOCs have such properties that they must cooccur with some modifying adjectives, can be focalized in peudocleft sentences, and can be pronominalized. Adverbial cognate objects, on the other hand, produce exactly the opposite results to what objective cognate objects do. The aim of this paper is to analyse and explain these differences both semantically and syntactically. Typically, this construction involves unergative verbs. The argument of this paper is based on the analysis of unergative verbs in Hale and Keyser (1991, 1993)(henceforth, H \u0026 K). I try to explain the diversity by partially modifying their argument. H & K assume that in the Lexicon, unergative verbs have a LRS (Lexical Relational Structure) where an V (which they regard something like a light verb) takes NP as its sister. Their claim is that unergative verbs are derived by incorporation of the head N of the NP to the governing V head. However, they mention little about the occurence of cognate objects. Thus their analysis as it is cannot explain the existence of the two types of unergative verbs and hence of cognate object constructions. What offers the key to a solution is to consider the semantic difference of nouns incorporated into the Vs. Nouns involved in the verbs in ACOC (e.g. laugh) have a property that their referents are dependent on some event V, that is, they refer to some situation created by the event V. On the other hand, nouns involved in the verb in OCOC (e.g. dance) have referents independent of the event V. Based on this consideration, I make an assumption that a noun which has an independent referent can optionally construct its copy in its trace position. According to this assumption, the incorporated noun dance can construct its copy in its trace position by virtue of having an independent referent, which realizes as the objective cognate object. It receives a θ-role, thus behaves as an argument with regard to the performance tests. As for laugh class verbs, construction of the copy is prohibited, not having an independent referent. Instead, this class of verbs optionally extend the structure with an NP adjoining to VP. This yields the ACOC. Since the NP serves as a modifier of the VP, it must appear with an adjective bearing some modifying information. Besides, not being an argument with any θ-role, it cannot passivized. And the property that they cannot pronominalized nor focalized is followed by their non-referentiality.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学英文学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0914-2266", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "山田, 佳子", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "90683", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Yamada, Keiko", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "90684", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-04-22"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ivy_28_113.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "644.8 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 644800.0, "url": {"label": "ivy_28_113.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/27898/files/ivy_28_113.pdf"}, "version_id": "c7e313a5-f7ae-4aa5-91d3-718cff526ca6"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "同族目的語構文について", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "同族目的語構文について", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2386"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030097", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-04-22"}, "publish_date": "2019-04-22", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "27898", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["同族目的語構文について"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 紀要
  3. IVY
  4. 28

同族目的語構文について

http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030097
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030097
dca19496-76aa-4d81-ac7c-24d782123b46
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ivy_28_113.pdf ivy_28_113.pdf (644.8 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-04-22
タイトル
タイトル 同族目的語構文について
言語 ja
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Two Types of Cognate Object Constructions
言語 en
著者 山田, 佳子

× 山田, 佳子

WEKO 90683

ja 山田, 佳子

Search repository
Yamada, Keiko

× Yamada, Keiko

WEKO 90684

en Yamada, Keiko

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述 This paper is concerned with sentences called cognate object constructions illustrated in (1). (1) a. She laughed a hearty laugh. b. She sang a song. It has been claimed that cognate object constructions are devided into two classes depending on their different syntactic behaviors (cf. Yasui (1983)). One is called the adverbial cognate object construction and the other the objective cognate object construction (henceforth, ACOC and OCOC). Objects in OCOCs have such properties that they must cooccur with some modifying adjectives, can be focalized in peudocleft sentences, and can be pronominalized. Adverbial cognate objects, on the other hand, produce exactly the opposite results to what objective cognate objects do. The aim of this paper is to analyse and explain these differences both semantically and syntactically. Typically, this construction involves unergative verbs. The argument of this paper is based on the analysis of unergative verbs in Hale and Keyser (1991, 1993)(henceforth, H & K). I try to explain the diversity by partially modifying their argument. H & K assume that in the Lexicon, unergative verbs have a LRS (Lexical Relational Structure) where an V (which they regard something like a light verb) takes NP as its sister. Their claim is that unergative verbs are derived by incorporation of the head N of the NP to the governing V head. However, they mention little about the occurence of cognate objects. Thus their analysis as it is cannot explain the existence of the two types of unergative verbs and hence of cognate object constructions. What offers the key to a solution is to consider the semantic difference of nouns incorporated into the Vs. Nouns involved in the verbs in ACOC (e.g. laugh) have a property that their referents are dependent on some event V, that is, they refer to some situation created by the event V. On the other hand, nouns involved in the verb in OCOC (e.g. dance) have referents independent of the event V. Based on this consideration, I make an assumption that a noun which has an independent referent can optionally construct its copy in its trace position. According to this assumption, the incorporated noun dance can construct its copy in its trace position by virtue of having an independent referent, which realizes as the objective cognate object. It receives a θ-role, thus behaves as an argument with regard to the performance tests. As for laugh class verbs, construction of the copy is prohibited, not having an independent referent. Instead, this class of verbs optionally extend the structure with an NP adjoining to VP. This yields the ACOC. Since the NP serves as a modifier of the VP, it must appear with an adjective bearing some modifying information. Besides, not being an argument with any θ-role, it cannot passivized. And the property that they cannot pronominalized nor focalized is followed by their non-referentiality.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学英文学会
出版者
言語 en
出版者 The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0914-2266
書誌情報 en : IVY

巻 28, p. 113-132, 発行日 1995-10-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:26:00.950632
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3