{"_buckets": {"deposit": "5bf7796c-2930-4aa7-a4c8-ded13053a6dd"}, "_deposit": {"id": "27936", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "27936"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027936", "sets": []}, "author_link": ["90955"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "\u66f8\u8a8c\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1997-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "114", "bibliographicPageStart": "89", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "30", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "IVY", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "\u6284\u9332", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "English believe-type (B-type) verbs and their French counterparts exhibit a striking contrast as to whether they can take exceptional Case-marking (ECM) infinitives as their complements. This topic has been the subject of much controversy in the literature and there seems to be little agreement about how to give a principled explanation. The aim of this paper is to explore this problem by considering the relations between selectional properties of matrix verbs and structural realizations of infinitival complements. To begin with, it is demonstrated that English infinitives and French infinitives have different categorial statuses : the former are TPs whose head contains the [-Finite] feature, whereas the latter are analyzed as VPs. It is also shown on the basis of the ambiguity of causatives that the [-Finite] feature of French infinitives is carried by the inflectional suffix-re. Having established the structural difference between two infinitives, I claim that the syntactic patterns of B-type verbs in these languages can be reduced to the general prohibition against VP complements. Even in English, bare VP complements cannot appear with B-type verbs. If French infinitives are VPs as I claim they are, it is naturally concluded that B-type verbs are subject to the same condition in both English and French. To clarify the condition at work, I propose that B-type verbs s-select the feature [proposition] and that it is carried by some functional category. In English, this feature is contained in T and lexical subjects are allowed to occur in [Spec, TP]. On the other hand, in French where the [-Finite] feature is realized as the inflectional suffix and there is no T within infinitives, C is selected as the locus of [proposition]. When an infinitival complement is CP, no lexical subjects can appear because the CP boundary blocks the A-movement to the matrix Case-checking position.  The peculiar behavior of English say, rumor, and allege is also explained in the same fashion. These verbs are obligatorily passivized when they take the ECM construction. I claim that their active forms and passive forms constitute different lexical items and that the former s-select [statement] while the latter s-select [proposition]. The semantic feature [statement] is always carried by C. It follows that the complement of the active forms must be realized as that-\u00adclauses. The passive forms, in contrast, are free from this constraint so that the complement can be realized as ECM infinitives when [proposition] is located in T.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "\u5185\u5bb9\u8a18\u8ff0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This is an expanded and revised version of the paper read at the 35th annual meeting SELN on April 20, 1996.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "\u51fa\u7248\u8005", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "\u540d\u53e4\u5c4b\u5927\u5b66\u82f1\u6587\u5b66\u4f1a", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005\u7248\u30d5\u30e9\u30b0", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN\uff08print\uff09", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0914-2266", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "\u30a2\u30af\u30bb\u30b9\u6a29", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "\u8457\u8005", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Nawata, Hiroyuki", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "90955", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "\u30d5\u30a1\u30a4\u30eb\u60c5\u5831", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-05-09"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ivy_30_89.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.1 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1100000.0, "url": {"label": "ivy_30_89.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/27936/files/ivy_30_89.pdf"}, "version_id": "e419c5f7-b121-4b8f-a83c-ae5ad77a9219"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "\u8a00\u8a9e", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "\u8cc7\u6e90\u30bf\u30a4\u30d7", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "The Correspondence between Functional Categories and Semantic Features in the ECM Construction", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "\u30bf\u30a4\u30c8\u30eb", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "The Correspondence between Functional Categories and Semantic Features in the ECM Construction", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["326/521/2321/2388"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030135", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-05-09"}, "publish_date": "2019-05-09", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "27936", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["The Correspondence between Functional Categories and Semantic Features in the ECM Construction"], "weko_shared_id": -1}