ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "1f5850fc-5902-4fd5-a59e-9b678fb46235"}, "_deposit": {"id": "27976", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "27976"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027976", "sets": ["2390"]}, "author_link": ["91152"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1999-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "141", "bibliographicPageStart": "115", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "32", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "IVY", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper discusses some syntactic properties of worth constructions, as given in (1). (1) a. Not all leather suitcases are worth money. b. It is worth quoting his exposition at some length c. The treaty was worth achieving. The worth constructions in (1) are peculiar in some respects. First, the adjective worth can take DP as its complement, as in (1a), while many other adjectives in English cannot. Second, worth can take gerundive complements, as in (1b), though sentences where gerunds are extraposed are less acceptable, compared with that or for-to clausal complements. Third,the matrix subject corresponds to the null object of the gerundive complement, as in (1c). Tough constructions exhibit the same syntactic property as (1c), as argued in the literature. In this paper, I will claim that the adjective worth has an AP shell structure, as in (2), in which the small a can check the Case feature of the complement, in order to explain the syntactic properties of worth constructions illustrated in (1). (2) [aP DP1 a [AP r worth DP2]] This structure might be verified by the fact that when worth does not take a nominal or gerundive complement, the sentence is ungrammatical, as in (3). (3) *achiving that status is worth If worth must always check the Case feature, the ungrammaticality of sentence (3) can be straightforwardly explained: the Case feature of worth remains unused. I will argue against the null operator movement analysis of worth constructions such as (1c), though there are phenomena characteristic of A\u0027-dependency in (4)-(5), which are shared by tough constructions. (4) A better love life is not worth dying for. (5) Is a rotten world not worth fighting for or saving? In (4), the preposition is stranded; sentence (5) exhibits effects of the Coordinate Structure Constraint and Across-the-Board. This paper further claims that the null object in gerunds is not null operator, PRO or pro, but it is an overt lexical element to be deleted at PF. To avoid a problem with theta-marking, in addition, it is also assumed that in a sentence like (1c), the matrix subject is base-generated in the specifier of aP, in which a θ-role is assigned to it, and raises into the subject position to check the EPP feature of T. The argument presented in this paper is based mainly on the data collected from COBUILD Direct.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学英文学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0914-2266", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Yanagi, Tomohiro", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91152", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-05-10"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ivy_32_115.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "721.8 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 721800.0, "url": {"label": "ivy_32_115.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/27976/files/ivy_32_115.pdf"}, "version_id": "4a57dc80-0c9e-4152-8d3b-80d6f3825717"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Worth Is Worth Investigating : A Corpus-based Analysis of Worth Constructions", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Worth Is Worth Investigating : A Corpus-based Analysis of Worth Constructions", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2390"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030174", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-05-10"}, "publish_date": "2019-05-10", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "27976", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Worth Is Worth Investigating : A Corpus-based Analysis of Worth Constructions"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 紀要
  3. IVY
  4. 32

Worth Is Worth Investigating : A Corpus-based Analysis of Worth Constructions

http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030174
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030174
a670eb5f-4d71-4ab6-aed3-ec9812e7dc12
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ivy_32_115.pdf ivy_32_115.pdf (721.8 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-05-10
タイトル
タイトル Worth Is Worth Investigating : A Corpus-based Analysis of Worth Constructions
言語 en
著者 Yanagi, Tomohiro

× Yanagi, Tomohiro

WEKO 91152

en Yanagi, Tomohiro

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述 This paper discusses some syntactic properties of worth constructions, as given in (1). (1) a. Not all leather suitcases are worth money. b. It is worth quoting his exposition at some length c. The treaty was worth achieving. The worth constructions in (1) are peculiar in some respects. First, the adjective worth can take DP as its complement, as in (1a), while many other adjectives in English cannot. Second, worth can take gerundive complements, as in (1b), though sentences where gerunds are extraposed are less acceptable, compared with that or for-to clausal complements. Third,the matrix subject corresponds to the null object of the gerundive complement, as in (1c). Tough constructions exhibit the same syntactic property as (1c), as argued in the literature. In this paper, I will claim that the adjective worth has an AP shell structure, as in (2), in which the small a can check the Case feature of the complement, in order to explain the syntactic properties of worth constructions illustrated in (1). (2) [aP DP1 a [AP r worth DP2]] This structure might be verified by the fact that when worth does not take a nominal or gerundive complement, the sentence is ungrammatical, as in (3). (3) *achiving that status is worth If worth must always check the Case feature, the ungrammaticality of sentence (3) can be straightforwardly explained: the Case feature of worth remains unused. I will argue against the null operator movement analysis of worth constructions such as (1c), though there are phenomena characteristic of A'-dependency in (4)-(5), which are shared by tough constructions. (4) A better love life is not worth dying for. (5) Is a rotten world not worth fighting for or saving? In (4), the preposition is stranded; sentence (5) exhibits effects of the Coordinate Structure Constraint and Across-the-Board. This paper further claims that the null object in gerunds is not null operator, PRO or pro, but it is an overt lexical element to be deleted at PF. To avoid a problem with theta-marking, in addition, it is also assumed that in a sentence like (1c), the matrix subject is base-generated in the specifier of aP, in which a θ-role is assigned to it, and raises into the subject position to check the EPP feature of T. The argument presented in this paper is based mainly on the data collected from COBUILD Direct.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学英文学会
出版者
言語 en
出版者 The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0914-2266
書誌情報 en : IVY

巻 32, p. 115-141, 発行日 1999-10-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:22:31.284310
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3