ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "472910ad-2b5d-4b1a-9a9b-674f7ce0c19b"}, "_deposit": {"id": "27979", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "27979"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00027979", "sets": ["2391"]}, "author_link": ["91155"], "item_1615768549627": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2000-10-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "88", "bibliographicPageStart": "61", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "33", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "IVY", "bibliographic_titleLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The main purpose of this paper is to investigate how process nominals are derived. It is well known that they behave just like verbs in certain respects.  (1) a. The examination of the students will take several hours. b. The destruction of the warehouse with a wrecking ball was frightening to watch. c. the doctor\u0027s examination of the patient while looking out the window. As the examples in (1) illustrate, process nominals take arguments, and they also cooccur with some adjuncts. Then an immediate question arises as to why these are observed. Recently several researchers (e.g. Fu, Roeper and Borer (1995)) suggest that such nominals are formed in the syntax and that their syntactic derivation is responsible for their verbal properties. In this paper, however, I argue against the idea that process nominals are formed in the syntax. It is shown that their syntactic derivation faces serious empirical and conceptual problems. Alternatively, based on the analysis proposed by Grimshaw (1990), I show that process nominals are formed in the lexicon through a word formation process which is assumed and argued for in this paper. Specifically, adapting the relativized \"head\" in morphology advocated by Di Sciullo and Williams (1987) and Di Sciullo (1992), I propose a new analysis, under which argument inheritance partially occurs in process nominalization. The present analysis can provide a proper account for not only the argument­taking property of process nominals but also their compatibility with some adjuncts. It is shown that their verbal properties are due to the fact that they have their own argument structure, which includes the Event argument. This will indicate that the theory of argument structure suffices to capture the verb-like properties which are observed in process nominals. This paper thus suggests that the lexical derivation is superior to the syntactic one in terms of process nominalization.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_description_5": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "This paper is a revised version of the paper read at the 51st General Meeting of the English Literary Society of Japan, Chubu, held at Toyama University.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学英文学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}, {"subitem_publisher": "The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University", "subitem_publisher_language": "en"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0914-2266", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Nimura, Shinichi", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "91155", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2019-05-10"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "ivy_33_61.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.2 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1200000.0, "url": {"label": "ivy_33_61.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/27979/files/ivy_33_61.pdf"}, "version_id": "1c7c5728-dbf1-409f-af02-c24e50df1df9"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "On the Derivation of Process Nominals", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "On the Derivation of Process Nominals", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2391"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030177", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2019-05-10"}, "publish_date": "2019-05-10", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "27979", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["On the Derivation of Process Nominals"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
  1. A100 文学部/人文学研究科・文学研究科・国際言語文化研究科
  2. A100b 紀要
  3. IVY
  4. 33

On the Derivation of Process Nominals

http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030177
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/00030177
57ca7384-24e6-4c89-ac4b-737e88831d57
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ivy_33_61.pdf ivy_33_61.pdf (1.2 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2019-05-10
タイトル
タイトル On the Derivation of Process Nominals
言語 en
著者 Nimura, Shinichi

× Nimura, Shinichi

WEKO 91155

en Nimura, Shinichi

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述 The main purpose of this paper is to investigate how process nominals are derived. It is well known that they behave just like verbs in certain respects. (1) a. The examination of the students will take several hours. b. The destruction of the warehouse with a wrecking ball was frightening to watch. c. the doctor's examination of the patient while looking out the window. As the examples in (1) illustrate, process nominals take arguments, and they also cooccur with some adjuncts. Then an immediate question arises as to why these are observed. Recently several researchers (e.g. Fu, Roeper and Borer (1995)) suggest that such nominals are formed in the syntax and that their syntactic derivation is responsible for their verbal properties. In this paper, however, I argue against the idea that process nominals are formed in the syntax. It is shown that their syntactic derivation faces serious empirical and conceptual problems. Alternatively, based on the analysis proposed by Grimshaw (1990), I show that process nominals are formed in the lexicon through a word formation process which is assumed and argued for in this paper. Specifically, adapting the relativized "head" in morphology advocated by Di Sciullo and Williams (1987) and Di Sciullo (1992), I propose a new analysis, under which argument inheritance partially occurs in process nominalization. The present analysis can provide a proper account for not only the argument­taking property of process nominals but also their compatibility with some adjuncts. It is shown that their verbal properties are due to the fact that they have their own argument structure, which includes the Event argument. This will indicate that the theory of argument structure suffices to capture the verb-like properties which are observed in process nominals. This paper thus suggests that the lexical derivation is superior to the syntactic one in terms of process nominalization.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述
内容記述 This paper is a revised version of the paper read at the 51st General Meeting of the English Literary Society of Japan, Chubu, held at Toyama University.
言語 en
内容記述タイプ Other
出版者
言語 ja
出版者 名古屋大学英文学会
出版者
言語 en
出版者 The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0914-2266
書誌情報 en : IVY

巻 33, p. 61-88, 発行日 2000-10-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 10:21:14.750332
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3