{"created":"2021-03-01T06:36:12.903852+00:00","id":28154,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"1e96bc01-8cf6-48d4-836a-5438d124bc51"},"_deposit":{"id":"28154","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"28154"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00028154","sets":["326:521:2321:2413"]},"author_link":["91590"],"item_1615768549627":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_9_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2015-11-30","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"106","bibliographicPageStart":"81","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"48","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"IVY","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The syntactic status of cognate objects has long been widely discussed. Jones (1988) argues that cognate objects are adjuncts because they are not allowed to undergo passivization. In contrast, Massam (1990) and Macfarland (1995) propose that cognate objects are always arguments, showing that they allow passivization and co-occur ·with the definite article. Matsumoto (1996) also suggests that cognate objects are arguments, positing that the possibility of passivization depends on their referentiality and reading, including a result reading and a manner reading. The main goal of the present paper is to clarify the status of cognate objects in present-day English by showing the historical developn1ent of cognate object constructions based on the data analyzed in Kume (2015). I attempt to push the adjunct analysis proposed in previous studies one step further, and suggest that cognate objects are predicate nominals in the complement position of a functional head, namely the RELATOR proposed by Den Dikken (2006). In ME, on and the dative case marker gradually disappeared from the live type of cognate object construction. In such cases, manner cognate objects can no longer be licensed in the complement position of V via inherent case marking, nor by the preposition on, which was replaced by an indefinite article. This, in turn, leads to the unified reanalysis of the structures, where vP is connected by the RELATOR (R) with the QP containing the cognate object. The manner reading of the cognate object arises in the same fashion as does beautifully. Similarly, in EME, the loss of the dative case marker and preposition in the cognate object construction of the unaccusative die leads to the reanalysis of the structures, where the manner reacting arises from the predication relationship between the vP and the QP containing the cognate object via mediation by the RELATOR (R). However, unlike in the unergative type, there is no predication within the vP in Spec RP because the vP's specifier position is not projected and the subject is merged as a complement of the unaccusative verb. Therefore, the predication relationship between the subject and the unaccusative verb is established after the subject moves to Spec TP for the purpose of the nominative case assignment. The unaccusative verb die can also take an object other than death, such as coward. Den Dikken (2006) argues that the adverbial suffix -ly is similar to like. If the structure of the predication relationship effected by like is also applied to die a coward, a coward is interpreted like an adverbial modifier via the predication relationship mediated by the null RELATOR with a function similar to that of like. Therefore, I conclude that NPs selected by the unaccusative verb die must be those that can enter into a predication relationship with an event denoted by the vP in Spec RP, whether or not they are cognate to the verb.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The earlier version of the present paper was presented at The 87th General Meeting of the English Literary Society of Japan, held at Rissho University on May 23-24, 2015. This research is supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25870871.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_9_publisher_32":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"名古屋大学英文学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"},{"subitem_publisher":"The society of english literature and linguistics Nagoya University","subitem_publisher_language":"en"}]},"item_9_select_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_9_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN（print）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0914-2266","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Kume, Yusuke","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"91590","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2019-05-27"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"ivy_48_81.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"972.1 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"ivy_48_81.pdf","objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/28154/files/ivy_48_81.pdf"},"version_id":"7bca6009-947c-40ef-b234-627d07e1cacd"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"eng"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"From Manner Cognate Object to Predicate Nominal : A Syntactic Change in the History of English","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"From Manner Cognate Object to Predicate Nominal : A Syntactic Change in the History of English","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"1","path":["2413"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2019-05-27"},"publish_date":"2019-05-27","publish_status":"0","recid":"28154","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["From Manner Cognate Object to Predicate Nominal : A Syntactic Change in the History of English"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-01-16T04:20:32.041942+00:00"}