@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00029852,
 author = {表, 弘一郎 and OMOTE, Koichiro},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {経済科学},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {In this paper, we focus on the relationship between (rarely) normativity-oriented sociology and normativity-free modern economics in the age when various norms struggle each other (or so-called post- fundamentalism). Sociology has been interested in the norm analysis since its foundation, but recently it is claimed that it should be more normative than ever, especially in need of re-grasping the economic. On the other hand, modern economics has forgotten its normativity since Robbins' 1932 definition, mainly analyzing economic phenomena by applied mathematical tools. Meanwhile, the recent discourses about capitalism, e.g., Fraser's definition of capitalism as "institutionalized social order", give us an opportunity for reexamination of the possible connection of social normativity and economic normativity, especially after 2008 GFC. It could be described as a kind of enlightenment function of economics, that is, redress of the information asymmetry, which requires disclosure of the closed negotiation process between territorial states and rating agencies. "Framing courts", which Fraser requires in the condition of post-fundamentalistic justice ("reflective justice"), could be in the struggle between sociology which should recognize its public role as re-embedding of the economic, and modern economics which acknowledges its methodological difficulty of the crisis-prediction.},
 pages = {13--27},
 title = {規範的社会学と現代経済学との交点 : フレイザーの資本主義論と正義論を参照して},
 volume = {67},
 year = {2020}
}