@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00029897,
 author = {顧, 彬楠 and Gu, Binnan},
 journal = {名古屋大学人文学フォーラム},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The premise of the establishment of Chinese intransitive passives is that there must be elements expressing the change of states or results. However, Japanese is not restricted to this manner. In addition, unergative verbs and unaccusative verbs can be used in Japanese intransitive passives. On the other hand, the establishment of Chinese intransitive passives is largely affected by the word class. Chinese passive structures with unaccusative verbs are inadequate, and the number of Chinese passive structures with unergative verbs is much less than that in Japanese. This article examines the difference of the cognitive model between Japanese and Chinese intransitive passives from the perspective of construals. The result suggests that in the case of construals, Japanese tends to be subjective, while Chinese tends to be objective. Furthermore, the differences in the resultative representation and the restriction of word class in Japanese and Chinese intransitive passives have a close relationship with the characteristics of their construals.},
 pages = {49--62},
 title = {日中両言語における自動詞受動文の対照研究 : 事態把握の観点から},
 volume = {3},
 year = {2020}
}