ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

{"_buckets": {"deposit": "11c45654-bff5-4219-8ed1-a013373ae91c"}, "_deposit": {"id": "29997", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "29997"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00029997", "sets": ["2502"]}, "item_9_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2020-01-31", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "30", "bibliographicPageStart": "17", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "66", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学"}]}]}, "item_9_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "In this paper, research investigating the positive outcomes of engaging in prosocial behavior on the well-being of the benefactor is reviewed. We focused on mediating (basic psychological need satisfaction) and moderating factors (culture, motivation, moral discourse), interpreting findings from the perspective of self-determination theory (Deci \u0026 Ryan, 2000). In the first part, literature probing for the association between prosocial behavior engagement and well-being was reviewed. Correlational (e.g. Meier \u0026 Stutzer, 2008), experimental (Martela \u0026 Ryan, 2016a) and interventional studies (Layous, Nelson, Oberle, Schonert-Reichl, \u0026 Lyubomirsky, 2012), have shown that individuals experience satisfaction from other-oriented behavior. Next, the mediating mechanism of this relationship was discussed, in particular, from the framework of self-determination theory. Evidence was gathered supporting that engagement in prosocial behavior satisfies individuals’ need to feel connected to others (relatedness need), need for autonomy in one’ action (autonomy need), and need for social competence (competence need), and that the satisfaction of these three psychological needs mediates the association between prosocial behavior engagement and well-being (Nelson, Layous, Cole, \u0026 Lyubomirsky, 2016). Although most research on the relationship between prosocial behavior and well-being had been conducted on Western samples, some cross-cultural studies have replicated these findings using participants with different cultural backgrounds, suggesting that the association between kindness and well-being is a cultural universal (Aknin et al., 2013). In the second part, focusing on the conditions under which engagement in prosocial behavior increases well-being, we reviewed research on the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation to help across cultures. Self-determination theory (Deci \u0026 Ryan, 1985) suggests that engaging in an activity for autonomous reasons (personal will, interest, enjoyment) leads to more satisfaction than engaging in an activity for controlled reasons (external coercion). Research on Western samples shows that autonomously motivated helping is conducive to positive affect, while helping someone in order to meet social expectations is not (Weinstein \u0026 Ryan, 2010). However, crosscultural studies reveal that not all individuals perceive social expectations as controlled reasons for action. For example, people from more collectivistic cultures experience agency and satisfaction by doing what is expected of them (Buchtel et al., 2018; Miller, Das, \u0026 Chakravarthy, 2011). These results suggest that individualists conceive agency and obligation to be incompatible, while collectivists reveal congruence between obligation and a sense of personal choice, as they have internalized social responsibilities to a greater degree (Chirkov, Ryan, \u0026 Kim, 2003). To explain the greater congruence between agency and obligation in collectivistic cultures, we referred to the Indian concept of dharma, which portraits fulfilling one’s duty as natural (Miller, 1997), and to Confucian Role Ethics, which conceptualizes wanting to meet one’s obligations as an expression of freedom (Rosemont \u0026 Ames, 2016). In the final part, directions for future research were discussed. More research is needed in order to clarify whether psychological need satisfaction has similar mediating effects on the association between prosocial behavior engagement and well-being in different cultures, how the congruence between obligation and agency can be tapped into by self-determination measures, whether the relationship between benefactor and beneficiary influences the degree of internalization of social obligations for participants from different cultures, and whether the type of morality discourse used in different cultures could account for the observed cultural differences in internalization of social expectations.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_9_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.18999/nupsych.66.1.3", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_9_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科"}]}, "item_9_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_9_source_id_61": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(Online)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "2434-1258", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_9_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN(print)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1346-1729", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "GHERGHEL, Claudia"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "99023", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "TAKAI, Jiro"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "99024", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-05-21"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "nupsych_66_3.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "886.9 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 886900.0, "url": {"label": "nupsych_66_3.pdf", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/29997/files/nupsych_66_3.pdf"}, "version_id": "1783b772-7739-4e67-9164-5c5ba84157f0"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "prosocial behavior", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "well-being", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "culture", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "self-determination", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "motivation", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "Prosocial behavior and well-being in different cultures", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Prosocial behavior and well-being in different cultures"}]}, "item_type_id": "9", "owner": "1", "path": ["2502"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.18999/nupsych.66.1.3", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2020-05-21"}, "publish_date": "2020-05-21", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "29997", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Prosocial behavior and well-being in different cultures"], "weko_shared_id": null}
  1. A200 教育学部/教育発達科学研究科
  2. A200b 紀要
  3. 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学
  4. 66

Prosocial behavior and well-being in different cultures

https://doi.org/10.18999/nupsych.66.1.3
https://doi.org/10.18999/nupsych.66.1.3
faf61c6a-ff7f-4d6c-9386-07a927ecc999
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
nupsych_66_3.pdf nupsych_66_3.pdf (886.9 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2020-05-21
タイトル
タイトル Prosocial behavior and well-being in different cultures
著者 GHERGHEL, Claudia

× GHERGHEL, Claudia

WEKO 99023

GHERGHEL, Claudia

Search repository
TAKAI, Jiro

× TAKAI, Jiro

WEKO 99024

TAKAI, Jiro

Search repository
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 prosocial behavior
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 well-being
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 culture
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 self-determination
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 motivation
抄録
内容記述 In this paper, research investigating the positive outcomes of engaging in prosocial behavior on the well-being of the benefactor is reviewed. We focused on mediating (basic psychological need satisfaction) and moderating factors (culture, motivation, moral discourse), interpreting findings from the perspective of self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000). In the first part, literature probing for the association between prosocial behavior engagement and well-being was reviewed. Correlational (e.g. Meier & Stutzer, 2008), experimental (Martela & Ryan, 2016a) and interventional studies (Layous, Nelson, Oberle, Schonert-Reichl, & Lyubomirsky, 2012), have shown that individuals experience satisfaction from other-oriented behavior. Next, the mediating mechanism of this relationship was discussed, in particular, from the framework of self-determination theory. Evidence was gathered supporting that engagement in prosocial behavior satisfies individuals’ need to feel connected to others (relatedness need), need for autonomy in one’ action (autonomy need), and need for social competence (competence need), and that the satisfaction of these three psychological needs mediates the association between prosocial behavior engagement and well-being (Nelson, Layous, Cole, & Lyubomirsky, 2016). Although most research on the relationship between prosocial behavior and well-being had been conducted on Western samples, some cross-cultural studies have replicated these findings using participants with different cultural backgrounds, suggesting that the association between kindness and well-being is a cultural universal (Aknin et al., 2013). In the second part, focusing on the conditions under which engagement in prosocial behavior increases well-being, we reviewed research on the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation to help across cultures. Self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) suggests that engaging in an activity for autonomous reasons (personal will, interest, enjoyment) leads to more satisfaction than engaging in an activity for controlled reasons (external coercion). Research on Western samples shows that autonomously motivated helping is conducive to positive affect, while helping someone in order to meet social expectations is not (Weinstein & Ryan, 2010). However, crosscultural studies reveal that not all individuals perceive social expectations as controlled reasons for action. For example, people from more collectivistic cultures experience agency and satisfaction by doing what is expected of them (Buchtel et al., 2018; Miller, Das, & Chakravarthy, 2011). These results suggest that individualists conceive agency and obligation to be incompatible, while collectivists reveal congruence between obligation and a sense of personal choice, as they have internalized social responsibilities to a greater degree (Chirkov, Ryan, & Kim, 2003). To explain the greater congruence between agency and obligation in collectivistic cultures, we referred to the Indian concept of dharma, which portraits fulfilling one’s duty as natural (Miller, 1997), and to Confucian Role Ethics, which conceptualizes wanting to meet one’s obligations as an expression of freedom (Rosemont & Ames, 2016). In the final part, directions for future research were discussed. More research is needed in order to clarify whether psychological need satisfaction has similar mediating effects on the association between prosocial behavior engagement and well-being in different cultures, how the congruence between obligation and agency can be tapped into by self-determination measures, whether the relationship between benefactor and beneficiary influences the degree of internalization of social obligations for participants from different cultures, and whether the type of morality discourse used in different cultures could account for the observed cultural differences in internalization of social expectations.
内容記述タイプ Abstract
出版者
出版者 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/nupsych.66.1.3
ID登録タイプ JaLC
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1346-1729
ISSN(Online)
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 2434-1258
書誌情報 名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学

巻 66, p. 17-30, 発行日 2020-01-31
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 09:10:55.140565
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3