@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00030988,
 author = {Kawashima, Nozomu},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {Traditional & Kampo Medicine},
 month = {Apr},
 note = {Aim: There may exist a gap between the current form of traditional Japanese Kampo pediatrics and Kampo pediatrics in the nineteenth century. This study aimed to elucidate changes in clinical practice by comparing the formulas used then and now. Methods: All formulas described in Yoyokasoku (In‐house Methods of Pediatrics [IMP], a Kampo classic published in 1885) and formulas used in a contemporary pediatric Kampo guideline were extracted. Then, a database with annotations to formulas was compiled. Results: In all, 387 formulas (274 excluding duplications) and 10 methods of moxibustion/surgical treatments were extracted from IMP. The total number of classical formulas described was 72. The proportion of classical formulas was significantly different among disease clusters (P < 0.0001). Overall, the contemporary Kampo guideline used classical formulas in any type of disease, and the proportion of this usage was significantly higher than that in IMP (59% vs. 19%, P < 0.0001). IMP described 95 Japanese original formulas (25%) including 45 in‐house formulas. However, none of them have been implemented in the contemporary guideline. Conclusion: Current Kampo pediatrics may have developed less under the influence of a pediatric classic in the nineteenth century; however, a thorough investigation of pediatric books is needed to understand the history of Kampo pediatrics., Version of Record online: 02 November 2020 ファイル公開：2021-11-02},
 pages = {100--105},
 title = {Comparison of the formulas from the current form of traditional Japanese pediatrics and those described in Yoyokasoku (in‐house methods of pediatrics): A representative pediatric classic},
 volume = {8},
 year = {2021}
}