@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00031837,
 author = {寺田, 盛紀 and TERADA, Moriki},
 journal = {生涯学習・キャリア教育研究, Journal of the Research on Lifelong Learning and Career Education},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This paper is written in Japanese for Japanese more broader researchers as the second publication of the online collection’s paper for the 16th Conference of the Asian Academic Society for Vocational Education and Training (December, 2020), which was titled as “Conflicts between Japanese Structure and German Model in Higher Vocational Education” (English paper: http://www.ubonasm.net/aasvet2020/program/ [December, 01,2020] ). It also tries to clarify the communalities and differences among the earliest model of German University of Applied Sciences, Korean Junior and Technical College as a front runner of Japan, and the newer Japanese Professional University. Analyses are conducted by using of some descriptors developed by some preceding studies and Terada’s three dimensions model. As results, we could make clear that the system design in Japan has triple sub systems, university (German type), college (American type) and articulated course of two stage (Korean type). From the view point of the relevance to occupations, in contrast to other two countries which they focus on technical occupations, Japan tends to allocate both kind of majors, occupational and broader industry- oriented ones. In the aspect of curricula, liberal arts and field practicums are characteristic as the didactical conditions, and the latter lines with Germany in the quantity level. The conflict between American-Japanese and German-Japanese model will continue, because there are quite few and short history for construction of German model in Japan. But we can notice the reformation of Japanese model by the further expansion of such universities.},
 pages = {1--15},
 title = {高等職業教育における日本モデルの構築 : 専門大学システムの独・韓・日比較},
 volume = {17},
 year = {2021}
}