@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004715,
 author = {水野, 晶子 and 藤村, 逸子 and Mizuno, Akiko and Fujimura, Itsuko},
 journal = {国際開発研究フォーラム, Forum of International Development Studies},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This paper discusses the alternation of the reflexive and non-reflexive constructions accompanied by at least one body part NP in Russian and French, in particular those that have three semantic arguments: A (agent) MOVE B (agent.s body part) TO C (place or another body part). First, positive differences in the use of reflexive constructions between Russian and French are shown following the corpus-based quantitative study. In Russian,  the  reflexive is commonly used to describe a prominent motion of A, which is brought about by the movement of the body part B to any place C. In French, however, it is employed for illustrating the movement of B to A.s own body part, C. These differences are attributable to  the different  case marking system adopted in  the reflexive constructions of this type in these two languages. In Russian, the reflexive-marker.s case is accusative and the argument B.s case is instrumental, whereas in French, the former case is dative and the latter case is accusative. Generally, it is solely  claimed  that the reflexive constructions express with their basic meaning an action by an agent reflected within, which is to say it is an internal  motion which never works  on  others. This  paper concretely  exemplyifies  that such a cognitive mechanism of the internal motion also has diversity and therefore needs further detailed investigation.},
 pages = {65--87},
 title = {身体部位名詞を伴う再帰構文における格の問題 : ロシア語とフランス語の比較},
 volume = {26},
 year = {2004}
}