@article{oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004744,
 author = {施, 文華 and Shih, Wenhua},
 journal = {国際開発研究フォーラム, Forum of International Development Studies},
 month = {Aug},
 note = {Taiwan Administration of justice authorities proclaimed the“Private international law revised draft”in May 2001. One feature is observed in it, namely doctrine of “Forum Non Convenience”. However, we should notice that this revised draft does not mention what kind of regulation the court in Taiwan requires in order to exercise international jurisdiction to an international civil action. The doctrine of FNC is one of the legal proceedings, which can function only after accepting jurisdiction in the court of a specific country. Even though the Private        International law of Taiwan introduces FNC this time, the determination problem of the international jurisdiction, that supposes to be priority, is still unsolved in the revised draft. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to discuss what kinds of problems are caused on the international PL suit involving the international jurisdiction in Taiwan by introduction of FNC. Moreover, I aim to consider whether a solution for these problems exists or not. In this paper, firstly, I survey the doctrine of FNC principle in the United States of America. Secondly, the Far Eastern Air Transport（FEAT）airplane crash in 1983 is taken up since the court in both Japan and in the US dismissed the suit. Then the problem of the international PL lawsuit by FNC is considered. Finally, on the assumption that a suit like the case of FEAT airplane crash might be carried into court in Taiwan, I examine what kind of judgment the Taiwanese court may pass on the case on condition that the revised draft passed followed by discussing whether the introduction of FNC is right or wrong.},
 pages = {197--217},
 title = {Forum Non Conveniens法理を台湾の国際私法に導入する当否について : 米国におけるForum Non Conveniens法理を手掛りとして},
 volume = {24},
 year = {2003}
}