ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. D100 大学院国際開発研究科
  2. D100b 刊行物
  3. 国際開発研究フォーラム
  4. 21

Judicialization of the World Trading System : Implications for Regulation of Regional Integration under GATT/WTO

https://doi.org/10.18999/forids.21.123
https://doi.org/10.18999/forids.21.123
f5a162b4-2350-47e6-8644-8bf6b603f6c5
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
06.pdf 06.pdf (135.7 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2006-03-29
タイトル
タイトル Judicialization of the World Trading System : Implications for Regulation of Regional Integration under GATT/WTO
言語 en
著者 Kuong, Teilee

× Kuong, Teilee

WEKO 87296

en Kuong, Teilee

Search repository
Kuong, Tei Lee

× Kuong, Tei Lee

WEKO 87297

en Kuong, Tei Lee

Search repository
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 With the creation of the World Trade Organization(WTO)in 1995, the world trading system organized in 1947 was infused with new life. Rules regulating world trade have developed both in the scope of coverage and in the depth of intervention. Much have been learnt of the legalization and judicialization process of change in the history of world trade rules1). The process culminated in the finalization of the Uruguay Round negotiations. This outcome at the Uruguay Round negotiations has been described in comparative terms as the triumph of lawyers over diplomats2). However, the outcome means more than a mere institutional and procedural development. Legalization and judicialization may be characterized with the multiplication of legal norms and the strengthening of the binding nature of these norms and the procedures for enforcing them3). Built on this general conception of the present international trade law, this paper is going to examine the impact which the process of legalization and judicialization of the world trading system has on one particular aspect of the international economic relation, namely multilateral regulation and control over establishment of regional economic arrangements. Long before the development of a trade legal system at the multilateral level, attempts among a number of mostly nations of vicinity to enter into some sort of customs unions4)took place mainly in Europe or under European auspices. In this sense, GATT 1947 could be viewed as one of the original efforts taken multilaterally to liberalize international trade amidst a long history of economic bloc cultures5). For pragmatic political reasons, liberalization under GATT and the defunct International Trade Organization(ITO)had to proceed hand in hand with certain accepted categories of regional arrangements6). Therefore, the issue of regional arrangements, regulated under Art.XXIV of GATT, as an exception to the fundamental principle of the most-favoured-nation(MFN)in the international trading system, originally took place in a particular historical and political context7). The regulatory mechanism established under Art.XXIV of GATT 1947 left examination of the compatibility of concrete regional integration agreements with GATT provisions to the GATT diplomats8). However, mainly since the 1990s discussions related to rules on regional arrangements have also taken place in the WTO dispute settlement organs. Is this Doctoral student, Graduate School of International Development, Nagoya University Judicialization of the World Trading System another proof of the judicialization development? To what extent has the WTO judicialization process brought the “diplomats’jurisprudence”9)under legal control? These questions will be dealt with in this paper, based on an examination of the multilateral rules on regional arrangements by focusing on the legal analysis and interpretation conducted on different occasions by the WTO panels and the appellate bodies. This study will lead to a further understanding of the nature of judicialization at work in the field of international economic law regulating regional agreements. Given the current increasing interest in the issue of “multilateralism vs. regionalism”10), a review and reevaluation of the issue of implementing Art.XXIV to keep regional agreements compatible with the multilateral rules under the GATT/WTO is an indispensable step to keep the present world trading system from the risk of melting down into hostile economic blocs11)
言語 en
出版者
出版者 Graduate School of International Development. Nagoya University
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
ID登録
ID登録 10.18999/forids.21.123
ID登録タイプ JaLC
関連情報
関連タイプ isVersionOf
識別子タイプ URI
関連識別子 http://www.gsid.nagoya-u.ac.jp/bpub/research/public/forum/21/06.pdf
ISSN(print)
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1341-3732
ISSN(Online)
収録物識別子タイプ EISSN
収録物識別子 2189-9126
書誌情報 ja : 国際開発研究フォーラム
en : Forum of International Development Studies

巻 21, p. 123-148, 発行日 2002-03
フォーマット
値 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:06:58.636235
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3