{"created":"2021-03-01T06:12:28.531595+00:00","id":5891,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"5c4622cb-83ff-4bea-bbda-1238d695ffbb"},"_deposit":{"id":"5891","owners":[],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"5891"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005891","sets":["608:609:610:731"]},"author_link":["87541","87542"],"item_1615768549627":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_9_alternative_title_19":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"The Policy Direction of the Chinese Draft　Anti-Monopoly Law in 2006 and Its future Challenges : The Current State of the Reform and Opening-up","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_9_biblio_info_6":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2007-03-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"122","bibliographicPageStart":"103","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"34","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国際開発研究フォーラム","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Forum of International Development Studies","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"The enactment of the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) may be considered a milestone in the law-making process in China, which has been promoting the reform and opening-up policy. As one of the substantive achievements of drafting efforts over the last decade, the latest Draft of AML in 2006 adopts a uniform harm requirement, under which monopolistic conducts should be prohibited only if they eliminate or restrict competition. However, it also envisages a division of enforcement authority among existing organs, which could significantly influence the direction of future enforcement. In the short term, the AML would not be able to promote domestic market integration by means of combating administrative monopolies such as regional blockade and sector-specific restriction of competition, since the Draft has delayed introducing effective remedies and establishing an independent and specialized enforcement agency. Rather, as a result of increasing concern about over-presence of foreign capitals after opening Chinese market, which was promised in the WTO accession protocol, the drafting work got the momentum in 2005 and 2006 to overcome a longstanding deadlock within the government. Accordingly, the AML, if enacted, would be probably used as a weapon to counteract abuse of dominant positions held by foreign capitals. In sum, China's enactment of the AML as drafted could be understood as a policy to mitigate impact of the opening-up and intergration into global markets, rather than as one to promote the reform toward a market economy and domestic market intergration.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_9_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.18999/forids.34.103","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_9_publisher_32":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"Graduate School of International Development, Nagoya University","subitem_publisher_language":"en"}]},"item_9_relation_43":{"attribute_name":"関連情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type":"isVersionOf","subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"http://www.gsid.nagoya-u.ac.jp/bpub/research/public/forum/34/07.pdf","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_9_select_15":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_select_item":"publisher"}]},"item_9_source_id_61":{"attribute_name":"ISSN（Online）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2189-9126","subitem_source_identifier_type":"EISSN"}]},"item_9_source_id_7":{"attribute_name":"ISSN（print）","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1341-3732","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_9_text_14":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"application/pdf"}]},"item_access_right":{"attribute_name":"アクセス権","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_access_right":"open access","subitem_access_right_uri":"http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"川島, 富士雄","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"87541","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Kawashima, Fujio","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"87542","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-02-19"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"07.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"11.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"07.pdf","objectType":"fulltext","url":"https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5891/files/07.pdf"},"version_id":"74401b10-efce-4c15-b964-3261634c9c45"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"中国独占禁止法2006年草案の選択と今後の課題 : 改革と開放の現段階","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"中国独占禁止法2006年草案の選択と今後の課題 : 改革と開放の現段階","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"1","path":["731"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2007-03-26"},"publish_date":"2007-03-26","publish_status":"0","recid":"5891","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["中国独占禁止法2006年草案の選択と今後の課題 : 改革と開放の現段階"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-01-27T05:16:53.873091+00:00"}