WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "4303aef9-6ca6-4c57-b1f3-c10e06be874d"}, "_deposit": {"id": "6087", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "6087"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp:00006087", "sets": ["747"]}, "author_link": ["16341", "16342"], "item_10_alternative_title_19": {"attribute_name": "その他のタイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_alternative_title": "How Long Have Philosophers Been Ignorant of the Essence of Experimental Natural Science?", "subitem_alternative_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_10_biblio_info_6": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "1997-11-10", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "42", "bibliographicPageStart": "29", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "30", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "科学哲学", "bibliographic_titleLang": "ja"}]}]}, "item_10_description_4": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "The aim of this paper is to propound a view that philosophical epistemology has failed to comprehend the essence of experimental natural science ever since the late seventeenth century. The first indication of the failure is given in Edward Stillingfleet’s misunderstanding of John Locke. In his Essay concerning Human Understanding, Locke tries to establish the distinction between the particular matters of fact and the universal theories of nature. Stillingfleet mistakenly counts him, however, among cartesians and regards his distinction as that of the objects in the mind and those in the external world. This misreading of Locke, which is common to later historians of philosophy, entails total misunderstanding of the essential trait of experimental science. The Lockean way of ideas is, if correctly understood, a successful vindication of the experiments based on sense perception and has nothing to do with the cartesian skepticism towards the senses.", "subitem_description_language": "en", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10_identifier_60": {"attribute_name": "URI", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_type": "HDL", "subitem_identifier_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/7708"}]}, "item_10_publisher_32": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "日本科学哲学会", "subitem_publisher_language": "ja"}]}, "item_10_select_15": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "publisher"}]}, "item_10_source_id_7": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "0289-3428", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "PISSN"}]}, "item_10_text_14": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "application/pdf"}]}, "item_1615787544753": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_access_right": {"attribute_name": "アクセス権", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_access_right": "open access", "subitem_access_right_uri": "http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "田村, 均", "creatorNameLang": "ja"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "16341", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}, {"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "Tamura, Hitoshi", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "16342", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2018-02-19"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "phi_sci_30_29.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.1 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_note", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1100000.0, "url": {"label": "phi_sci_30_29.pdf", "objectType": "fulltext", "url": "https://nagoya.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/6087/files/phi_sci_30_29.pdf"}, "version_id": "97c535b4-46d6-48cf-a119-66238c1093e9"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "journal article", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "哲学的認識論はいつから科学オンチになったのか?", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "哲学的認識論はいつから科学オンチになったのか?", "subitem_title_language": "ja"}]}, "item_type_id": "10", "owner": "1", "path": ["747"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2237/7708", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "PubDate", "attribute_value": "2007-04-16"}, "publish_date": "2007-04-16", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "6087", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["哲学的認識論はいつから科学オンチになったのか?"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
哲学的認識論はいつから科学オンチになったのか?
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/7708
http://hdl.handle.net/2237/7708e29c16f1-d9fa-4f50-ae4e-6ab68a458438
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2007-04-16 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 哲学的認識論はいつから科学オンチになったのか? | |||||
言語 | ja | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | How Long Have Philosophers Been Ignorant of the Essence of Experimental Natural Science? | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
著者 |
田村, 均
× 田村, 均× Tamura, Hitoshi |
|||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | open access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述 | The aim of this paper is to propound a view that philosophical epistemology has failed to comprehend the essence of experimental natural science ever since the late seventeenth century. The first indication of the failure is given in Edward Stillingfleet’s misunderstanding of John Locke. In his Essay concerning Human Understanding, Locke tries to establish the distinction between the particular matters of fact and the universal theories of nature. Stillingfleet mistakenly counts him, however, among cartesians and regards his distinction as that of the objects in the mind and those in the external world. This misreading of Locke, which is common to later historians of philosophy, entails total misunderstanding of the essential trait of experimental science. The Lockean way of ideas is, if correctly understood, a successful vindication of the experiments based on sense perception and has nothing to do with the cartesian skepticism towards the senses. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
言語 | ja | |||||
出版者 | 日本科学哲学会 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプresource | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
タイプ | journal article | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0289-3428 | |||||
書誌情報 |
ja : 科学哲学 巻 30, p. 29-42, 発行日 1997-11-10 |
|||||
フォーマット | ||||||
application/pdf | ||||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
値 | publisher | |||||
URI | ||||||
識別子 | http://hdl.handle.net/2237/7708 | |||||
識別子タイプ | HDL |